Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP13 Oct 2017FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A disposal order by the APellate Tribunal, PMLA regarding two ad-interim orders before the Madras High Court. The Tribunal notes the High Court disposed of the Department's appeal with directions not to enforce the interim order. The respondent's application for short time is dismissed as the matter is disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Respondent's application for short time to conclude arguments dismissed as matter disposed based on High Court's order.

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3108/CHN/2017 (Misc) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

¶4

S. Mahesh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the Appellant	:	Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate Mr. E. Omprakash, Senior Advocate Ms. Madhusmita Bora, Advocate Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
For the Respondent	:	Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

¶7

ORDER 13.10.2017

¶8

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 & MP-PMLA-3108/CHN/2017 (Misc)

¶9

Learned counsel for the appellant has handed over the Order passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 11^th October, 2017 wherein the appeal filed by the Department has been disposed of with the directions that the appellant herein is not pressing the Interim Order till the disposal of the appeal. The respondent’s application filed on the last date is disposed of accordingly.

¶10

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed additional written synopsis which are taken on record. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, learned counsel for the appellant has made submissions and clarified certain aspect of the matter. Mr. Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent has already argued the matter. Learned counsel for

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 Page 1 of 2

¶12

the respondent seeks short time to conclude his arguments on the next

¶13

date of hearing.

¶14

List on 14^th

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

(Anand Kishore)

¶17

Member

¶18

New Delhi, 13^th October, 2017

¶19

‘AS’

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

¶21

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases