No substantive legal issue was decided; the order merely acknowledges the fresh appeal and stay application, directs notice to the respondent, grants time for reply, and lists the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3095/HYD/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1619/HYD/2017
Jella Jagan Mohan Reddy … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Shri Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate Shri J. Jagal Mohan Reddy, Appellant |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
CORAM |
|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 07.02.2017
MP-PMLA-3095/HYD/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1619/HYD/2017
Fresh appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant. Issue notice
of the appeal and application to the respondent. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks time to file the reply in appeal and stay application. Let the replies be filed within four weeks. List the appeal along with the stay application on 20th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 7th February, 2017
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1619/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Jella Jagan Mohan Reddy
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
