Procedural order in a money laundering appeal under Section 82 PMLA. No reply filed by respondent. Final reply and rejoinder timelines granted. Matter listed for future hearing.
Allowed leave to file reply within four weeks; rejoinder permitted thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3019/PTN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1593/PTN/2016 Shri Sindhu Devi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajesh Mehata, Advocate Shri Devendra Singh, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Shaijan C. Gorge, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1593/PTN/2016
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to counsel for the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 27th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd February, 2017 ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1593/PTN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri Sindhu Devi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
