A single-paragraph procedural order listing a forfeiture appeal and allowing time for filing a rejoinder before next hearing. No substantive legal question was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
Mrs. Rajni @ Sunita Ashitkar
… Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Ratnessh Srivastwa, Inspecting Officer
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 24.01.2017
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
The respondent has filed the reply. The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks time to file rejoinder. Let the same be done within four weeks.
List the matter on 11th April, 2017.
In the meanwhile Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate has filed the fresh vakalatnama in his favour. The same be taken on record.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 24th January, 2017
‘R’
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Rajni @ Sunita Ashitkar
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
