This order from the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA at New Delhi allowed both parties to file a written synopsis before the next hearing, listing the matter for 20th February 2018. No substantive decision was rendered.
None. Parties allowed to file synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
Mrs. Rajni @ Sunita Ashitkar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. R.N. D’souza, J.C. Shri Ratnesh Srivastava, I.O,
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
19.09.2017
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or before
the next date of hearing.
List on 20th February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
19th September, 2017
‘s’
FPA-ND-60/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Rajni @ Sunita Ashitkar
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
