The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property disposed of the appeal regarding property forfeiture. The court noted the appellant was acquitted and the respondent did not appeal, leading to the appeal's disposal without a detailed ruling.
Appeal disposed of in view of the acquittal order dated 8th February, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Naresh Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anuj Pal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Manoj Dargar, Advocate Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 19.05.2017
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Admittedly the appellant was acquitted by order dated 8th February, 2017. As of today no appeal has been field by the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he will approach the Competent Authority for release of property in view of the section 68(Z) of NDPS Act1985. In view of the same the appeal is accordingly disposed of in view of the order passed on 8th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 19th May, 2017. ‘s’
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015 Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of given the appellant's acquittal and the respondent's failure to appeal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Naresh Kumar
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
