The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property ordered the Competent Authority to be added as a respondent and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of party within two weeks.
The office of the Competent Authority is made as Respondent No. 2 in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Naresh Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anuj Pal For the respondent : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 08.02.2017
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the appellant has not made the Competent Authority as a party in the appeal. It is necessary to make the Competent Authority a party.
Accordingly the office of the Competent Authority is made as Respondent No. 2 in the matter.
Amended memo of party be filed by the appellant within two weeks.
List the appeal for final arguments on 7th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 8th February, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Naresh Kumar
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
