The appellant was allowed to file a rejoinder as no one appeared for him during the hearing proceedings.
Appellant allowed to file rejoinder within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Naresh Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
10.10.2016
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Affidavit in terms of order dated 1st February, 2016 has been filed along with the reply. When the matter is taken up no one is appearing on behalf of the appellant. The appellant is allowed to file the rejoinder within four weeks from today.
List on 8th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 10th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-ND-32/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Naresh Kumar
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
