Order granting one final opportunity to the appellant to deposit outstanding occupation charges within three weeks and to pay current charges monthly.
Granted one week after order to deposit outstanding occupation charges within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-5/BOM/2014
Maya Ajit Satam … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
07.08.2017
FPA-5/BOM/2014
The counsel for the respondent submits that since April 2017, the occupation charges have not been deposited by the appellant. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to deposit the same within three weeks. The appellant shall also keep on depositing the current occupation charges on a monthly basis by the 7th of the succeeding month from August, 2017.
List on 29th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 7th August, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-5/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is granted time to deposit outstanding occupation charges.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maya Ajit Satam
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
