FPA-5/BOM/2014 of Maya Ajit Satam v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
MAYA AJIT SATAM V/s The Competent Authority…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-5/BOM/2014
MAYA AJIT SATAM … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri R.N. D’Souza, Joint Commissioner Shri Stanly Joseph, Inspecting Officer
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 25.10.2016
FPA-5/BOM/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has not passed any stay order, not to proceed with the present appeal. In the affidavit it is mainly stated that SLP is coming up on 16th November, 2016. Thus there is no impediment to hear the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Maya Ajit Satam
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court