Admittedly, in pursuance of the order dated 07th July, 2014, the appellant has deposited a sum of Rs. 50,000/- for the month of July, 2014 and August of 2014. Thereafter, the deposit of the said amount fixed by this Tribunal on 07th July, 2014 has not been complied by the appellant. With respect to property at S.No. 29, we have advised the learned counsel for the appellant that at least half of the amount fixed in the order dated 07th July, 2014 should have been deposited or any clarification should have been sought by the appellant with respect to the said order dated 07th July, 2014. His only submission is that this property belongs to father of the Ajit Satam, therefore, the application has been filed for modification of order dated 07th July, 2014. We are of the view that the appellant ought to have deposited half of the amount fixed by this Tribunal if the said property was to be enjoyed by the appellant. We are not impressed with the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant that the property belongs to the father of Ajit Satam and, therefore, the appellant will not comply order passed by this Tribunal.
