The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to comply with the order dated 17th July 2014, resulting in the vacating of the interim order. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
The interim order was vacated by modifying the order purged due to non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-51/BOM/2015 (Rest.) &
FPA-4/BOM/2014
AJIT BAPU SATAM … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 07.08.2017
FPA-4/BOM/2014
The counsel for the respondent submitted that the appellant has not complied with the order dated 17th July 2014. Thus, the interim order is vacated by modifying the order.
List this appeal on 29th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member New Delhi, 7th August, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-4/BOM/2014 Page 1 of 1
AJIT BAPU SATAM
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
