FPA-4/BOM/2014 of Ajit Satam v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Ajit Satam V/s The Competent Authority…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
MP-37/BOM/2014 (Stay) FPA-4/BOM/2014
Ajit Satam … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. |
CORAM |
|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
27.03.2017
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ajit Satam
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court