Disposed

FPA-17/LKW/1997 of Akash Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

ATFP15 Nov 2017FPA-17/LKW/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The tribunal noted the appellant's failure to deposit consolidated costs under a previous order. Upon receipt of the cheque by the court, the tribunal imposed an additional penalty and directed payment of the total amount within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Further cost of Rs. 30,000 imposed; direction to deposit total amount of Rs. 2.00 lac within two weeks.

FPA-17/LKW/1997 of Akash Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow — ATFP (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-89/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-28/LKW/2014 (Sub.) MP-29/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD)

¶3

In FPA-17/LKW/1997 Akash Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN MRS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER

¶6

ORDER 15.11.2017

¶7

MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD), FPA-17/LKW/1997

¶8

It appears that the order dated 16^th February, 2017 has not been complied by the appellant. As per the said order a consolidated cost in all the matters of Rs. 1.70 lac was to be deposited in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within four weeks. However, the same was not deposited.

¶9

Today when the matter was taken up, the counsel for the appellant has brought the cheque of Rs. 1.70 lac in the name of the Prime Minister Relief Fund. He submitted that the same was not accepted by them as it was supposed to be deposited within four weeks from 16^th February, 2017.

¶10

Apparently, there is a delay of more than 8 months and negligence on the part of the appellant. For the said purposes further cost of Rs.

¶11

FPA-17/LKW/1997

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

30,000/- is imposed upon the appellant. Last opportunity is now given to the appellant to deposit the earlier cost of Rs. 1.70 lac and Rs. 30,000/that is total amount of Rs. Two Lac within two weeks from today by way of Bank Draft in the name of Prime Minister Relief Fund by the next date of hearing. The appellant is directed to produce the receipt of the said amount on the next date of hearing.

¶14

The Counsel for the appellant submits that the paper book containing synopsis and relevant documents is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry within two weeks.

¶15

List on 16^th March, 2018.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶18

New Delhi, 15^th November, 2017 ‘K’

¶19

FPA-17/LKW/1997

¶20

Page 2 of 2

FPA-17/LKW/1997 of Akash Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-17/LKW/1997 of Akash Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases