FPA-17/LKW/1997 of Akash Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Paternal Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for adjournment due to non-compliance with a prior order regarding cost deposit in the Prime Minister Relief Fund, though it adjourned the matter pending compliance.
What did the court decide?
Application for adjournment refused; main matter adjourned subject to deposit of Rs. 10,000/- in Prime Minister Relief Fund within four weeks.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-89/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-28/LKW/2013 (Sub.) MP-29/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD) & FPA-17/LKW/1997 Akash Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Devender Singh, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shi Anil Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 16.02.2017
FPA-17/LKW/1997
A proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and seeks yet another adjournment. Last order has not been complied by appellant. The cost has not been deposited in Prime Minister Relief Fund. He is not aware about whether the cost has been deposited or not. No proof has been produced. He submits that the arguing counsel is busy in Bangalore, as there is a death in his family.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Akash Jaiswal
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court