The Appellate Tribunal adjourned the hearing to allow the appellant three weeks to file an amended appeal, requesting an advance copy of the application.
Three weeks time granted to file amended appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-12/BOM/2014 M/s Royal Developers & Ors. … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ashish Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER
ORDER
28.04.2017
FPA-12/BOM/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the order passed on 27th March, 2017, seeks three weeks time to file the amend appeal. Let the same be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the respondent who may file the amended reply if so required by the next date.
List on 10th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
New Delhi, 28th April, 2017
‘d’
Page of 1 of 1
FPA-12/BOM/2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Royal Developers & Ors.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
