An order listing the taxpayer to appear on a date to submit additional documents in an amendment application filed in an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property.
Allowed the appellant to file a list of dates along with copies of relevant documents within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-12/BOM/2014
M/s Royal Developers & ors
Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ashish Jain, Representative For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 23.01.2017
FPA-12/BOM/2014
The appellant has filed the present application for amendment of the present appeal in the ground of subsequent events. No reply to the application has been filed by the Competent Authority, though reply to the appeal is filed. Arguments have been addressed by both sides and orders are reserved.
The learned counsel for the appellant is allowed to file list of dates along with copies of relevant documents if not already filed, within one week.
List on 27th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 23rd January, 2017.
‘K’
Page of 1 of 1
FPA-12/BOM/2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Royal Developers & ors
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
