The Tribunal granted time to the respondent to file reply within six weeks with advance copy to appellant's counsel, who may file rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
Time granted to respondent to file reply within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-12/BOM/2014
M/s Royal Developers & Ors.
… Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Ish Jain, Advocate Shri Rajan Yadav, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri R.N. D’souza, J.C. Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
24.10.2016
FPA-12/BOM/2014
After filing the appeal, the applicant/appellant has filed an application for amendment of the appeal in view of the subsequent event happened as mentioned in the application. Reply to the application has not been filed by the respondent. The respondent seeks time to file the reply.
Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List the application on 23rd January, 2017.
FPA-6/BOM/2012
Page 1 of 2
In the mean time, the appellant will prepare the list of dates and events and file the same before the next date of hearing. The counsel for the appellant is also allowed to paginate the file of the Tribunal.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
24th October, 2016
‘s’
FPA-1/BOM/2012
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant time to the respondent to file reply to applicant's application for amendment of appeal.
M/s Royal Developers & Ors.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
SHRI ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
