Disposed¶385

Dake Sudarshan Rao v. Idbi Bank Limited

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Jul 2026WP/21010/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati (Ravi Cheemalapati J, 09.07.2026): batch writ petitions by IDBI Bank borrowers for return of original title deeds and release of mortgages after loan closure/No Dues Letters, documents seized by CBI; writ petitions disposed with direction to bank to seek release of documents from the concerned Court within two weeks; Article 226 mandamus; Articles 14, 19, 21, 300A; Section 151 CPC; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent bank to file appropriate applications/petitions before the concerned Court for release of the original title deeds within two weeks of receipt of the order; the concerned court to dispose of such applications on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible; no order as to costs. ¶385

Dake Sudarshan Rao Vs Idbi Bank Limited — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶385

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondent banks can be compelled to return the original title deeds deposited as mortgage security and release the mortgages after complete discharge of the loans, where the title documents have been seized by the CBI in connection with a crime. +1 more

¶371

Court's answer

The Court disposed of the writ petitions directing the respondent bank to take steps by filing appropriate applications/petitions before the concerned Court for release of the original title deeds within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

¶384

Ratio / Principle

Upon such applications being filed, the concerned court shall dispose of them on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶384

Key takeaways

The disposal was made without going into the merits or demerits of whether any of the petitioners have any connection with the crime.ratio¶384
There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶385
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Common order disposing of a batch of seventeen writ petitions (W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch) filed under Article 226 by borrowers of IDBI Bank who, after discharging their loans and/or receiving No Dues Letters, sought return of original title deeds deposited as mortgage security and release of the mortgages; the documents had been seized by the CBI in connection with a crime. Without examining whether any petitioner had any connection with the crime, the Court directed the respondent bank to file appropriate applications before the concerned Court for release of the title deeds within two weeks of receipt of the order, the concerned court to decide such applications on merits as expeditiously as possible; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

¶1

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶2

¶3

Date of reserved for order s : Date of pronouncement :09.07.2026 Date of uploading :16.07.2026

¶4

APHC010385212025

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

[3332]

¶7

THUR S DAY, THE 9^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO: 19501/2025 along with

¶11

W.P.Nos.19508, 19510, 21010, 21014, 28529 32978, 33006, 33042, 33083,33102, 33110, 35778, 35833, 35850, 35852 & 35957 of 2025

¶12

W.P.No.19501 of 2025 Between:

¶13

VANAPALLI USH A RANI, W/O LEELA PRASAD, A G E 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 6-78, REDDY STREET, AKIVIDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTR I CT, ANDHRA PRADESH 534235

¶14

...PETITIONER

¶15

AND

¶16

IDBI BANK LIMIT E D, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, D O OR NO.46-2211, K.S.R PLA Z A, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESE N TED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIG N ATORY

¶17

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION O FFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, VI S AKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶20

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a. Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioner property as described in Schedule by the Petitioner after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners c.and to pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶28

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.19508 of 2025

¶30

Between:

¶31

ALLURI VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, S/O A. SATYANRARAYANA RAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO.2-221/105, BHAGYA NAGAR STREET, SHANTI APARTMENTS, KUKATPALLI, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT TELANGANA

¶32

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶33

¶34

MALLAREDDY RAVI SEKHAR, , S/O M.ATCHUTA RAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.1-88-1, BHUVVANPALLI VILLAGE, DAMARRU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶35

...PETITIONER(S)

¶36

AND

¶37

IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOORNO.46-22-11, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

¶38

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIFATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶39

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶40

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. a. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners and to pass such

¶41

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶43

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶44

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶45

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶46

¶47

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶48

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶49

WRIT PETITION NO: 19510/2025

¶50

Between:

¶51

THIRUMALA RAMESH, NS/O NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O CHINA KAPAVARAM, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶52

GUBBALA NARAYANA SWAMY, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC BUSINESS, D. NO.5-75, CHINA KAPAVARAM, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADES

¶53

...PETITIONER(S)

¶54

AND

¶55

IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-2211, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

¶56

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIFATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶57

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶58

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

¶59

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶60

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus: Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners a. property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as

¶61

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶62

¶63

being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners pass

¶64

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶65

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶66

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶67

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶68

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶69

WRIT PETITION NO: 21010/2025

¶70

Between:

¶71

DAKE SUDARSHAN RAO, S/O MAHANKALI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 2-166,LLLAPAKURRU, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶72

...PETITIONER

¶73

AND

¶74

IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-2211, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

¶75

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶76

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶77

¶78

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶79

¶80

the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025 as being arbitrary, illegal ana violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300Aof the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners. c. and to pass

¶81

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶82

¶83

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶84

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶85

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶86

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶87

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶88

WRIT PETITION NO: 21014/2025

¶89

Between:

¶90

KASA KRISHNA VEERA RAGHAVULU,, S/O SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 3- 128,LLLAPAKURRU, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶91

PAIDI RAM BABU,, S/O DHARMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCCBUSINESS, D. NO. 1-200/1 ,SIRAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶92

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶93

¶94

BOKKA TATA RAO, , S/O NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC - BUSINESS D NO.5-51/1 ,GUMPARU VIILAGE,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶95

SIRRA NAGENDRA PRASAD ,, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCCBUSINESS D NO.482/1,LLLAPAKURRU,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶96

KUNCHE SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O MOHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCCBUSINESS D NO.4-

¶97

14/2,LLLAPAKURRU,YEIAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶98

...PETITIONER(S)

¶99

AND

¶100

IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-2211, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

¶101

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM

¶102

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶103

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025 as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners c. pass such other order or orders as this Flon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS a)

¶104

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶105

¶106

Document No.2735/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1400 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.297,298,366,367,444,445 and 446 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-Pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 b. Document No. 1870/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1573 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.555 to 558, 576 to 578 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 c) Document No.2738/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.425 to 430 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 d) Document No. 1895/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 10 plots i.e Plot No.456 to 458,Plot No.462 to 468 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 e) Document No.1873/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2163 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.546,547,Plot No.550 to 553,Plot No.563 to 565 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.5 f) Document No.1871/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2066 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.566 to 568,Plot No.679 to 682,Plot No.717 to 718 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 g) Document No.2736/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1402 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.431 to 437 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 h) Document No.1872/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2292 Sq.

¶107

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶108

¶109

yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.569 to 570,Plot No.573 to 575,Plot No.585 to 586,Plot No. 591 to 592 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1 i) Document No.2737/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and property 1373 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.438 to 443 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and l, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1

¶110

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶111

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in interest of justice. SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS a) Document No.2735/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1400 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.297,298,366,367,444,445 and 446 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-Pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 b) Document No.1870/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1573 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.555 to 558, 576 to 578 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 c) Document No.2738/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.425 to 430 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 d) Document No.1895/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 10 plots i.e Plot No.456 to 458,Plot No.462 to 468 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea Citypochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 e) Document No. 1873/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2163 Sq.

¶112

RC,J

¶113

W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶114

¶115

yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.546,547,Plot No.550 to 553,Plot No.563 to 565 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea Citypochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.5 f) Document No.1871/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2066 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.566 to 568,Plot No.679 to 682,Plot No.717 to 718 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea Citypochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 g) Document No.2736/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1402 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.431 to 437 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 h) Document No. 1872/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2292 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.569 to 570,Plot No.573 to 575,Plot No.585 to 586,Plot No. 591 to 592 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1 i) Document No.2737/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1373 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.438 to 443 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1

¶116

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶117

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶118

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶119

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶120

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶121

WRIT PETITION NO: 28529/2025

¶122

Between:

¶123

VEGESNA VENKATA SATYA KANAKA DURGA NAGA SOMA RAJU

¶124

@ AIRTEL SOMARAJU @ PANDU, S/O SUNDARA RAMARAJU,

¶125

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶126

¶127

AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O MAHADEVAPATNAM, UNDI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT.

¶128

VEGESNA SARASWATHI, W/O VEGESNA VENKATA SATYA KANAKA DURGA NAGA SOMA RAJU @ AIRTEL SOMARAJU @ PANDU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O MAHADEVAPATNAM, UNDI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT.

¶129

...PETITIONER(S)

¶130

AND

¶131

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND SENIOR REGIONAL HEAD, I FLOOR, PYDA CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530003.

¶132

THE BRANCH MANAGER, IDBI PALANGI BRANCH, TANUKU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT.

¶133

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶134

...RESPONDENT(S):

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶139

¶140

dated 26- 07-2011, Doc. No. 940/2011 dated 23-07-2011, and Doc. No. 3588/2011 dated 29-08-2011) to the petitioners by releasing the Mortgage deeds at relevant SRO's forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶141

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶142

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶143

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶144

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶145

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶146

WRIT PETITION NO: 32978/2025

¶147

Between:

¶148

SMT. JHANSI LAKSHMI INDUKURI, W/O SURYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶149

...PETITIONER

¶150

AND

¶151

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

¶152

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶153

CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶154

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶155

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶156

¶157

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not returning my original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08-1992 of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to Ac.01.35 cents in R.S.No.260, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 K9). 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to return the original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08-1992 of SRO Tallarevu) to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

¶158

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶159

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08- 1992 of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to Ac.01.35 cents in R.S.No.260, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶160

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶161

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶162

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶163

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶164

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶165

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶166

¶167

WRIT PETITION NO: 33006/2025

¶168

Between:

¶169

I P R MOHAN RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O VILLA NO.33, JAYABHERI TEMPLE TREE, NANAKRAMGUDA, HYDERABAD.

¶170

...PETITIONER

¶171

AND

¶172

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

¶173

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶174

CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶175

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶176

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not releasing the mortgage and not returning my original title deed vide sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 0604-1992 of SRO Tallarevu (pertaining to Ac. 0.65 cents in R.S.No.260 covered under Doc.No.3786/1992 Ac. 0.184 cents in R.S.No.213/2A/1 covered under Doc.No.787/1992, both situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 )(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart

¶177

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶178

¶179

from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 06-04 1992 of SRO Tallarevu, to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

¶180

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶181

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 06-04-1992 of SRO Tallarevu (pertainingo Ac. 0.65 cents in R.S.No.260 covered under Doc.No.3786/1992 Ac. 0.184 cents in R.S.No.213/2A/1 covered under Doc.No.787/1992, both situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶182

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶183

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶184

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶185

1.M RAVIKUMAR

¶186

WRIT PETITION NO: 33042/2025

¶187

Between:

¶188

I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD.

¶189

SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶190

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003

¶195

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶196

CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION CBI, REP BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶197

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶198

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not returning our original title deeds and not releasing the mortage of our documents vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 2, 3, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 Kg). 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to release the mortage and return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 pertaining to land admeasuring of Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 2, 3, chollangi village, Tallarevu Mandal, E.G.District to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

¶199

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶200

¶201

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶202

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortage and return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 pertaining to land admeasuring of Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 3, chollangi village, Tallarevu Mandal, E.G.District to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶203

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶204

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶205

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶206

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶207

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶208

WRIT PETITION NO: 33083/2025

¶209

Between:

¶210

INDUKURI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O LATE JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O G-2, BLOCK E-4, DEVI NIVAS, MADHURA NAGAR, NEAR VELLANKI FOODS, HYDERABAD - 500038, TELANGANA STATE.

¶211

...PETITIONER

¶212

AND

¶213

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

¶214

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶215

¶216

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶217

CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶218

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶219

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not releasing the mortgage and not returning my original title deed vide sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03-2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District, Telangana, even after issuance of No Dues Certificate dated 29-12- 2020, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03-2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District Telangana, even after issuance of No Dues Certificate dated 29-12-2020 to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

¶220

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶221

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03- 2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District, Telangana, to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶222

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶223

¶224

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶225

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶226

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶227

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶228

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶229

WRIT PETITION NO: 33102/2025

¶230

Between:

¶231

I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD. 2.

¶232

SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶233

...PETITIONER(S)

¶234

AND

¶235

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, AS THE IDBI BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003. 2.

¶236

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.

¶237

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI, REP.BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATHAM

¶238

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶239

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶240

¶241

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not returning our original title deeds and not releasing the mortage of our documents vide doc.no.788/1992 dated 06-04-1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-08- 1992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1, 260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of (Doc.No.788/1992 dated 06-04-1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-08- 1992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1, 260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

¶242

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶243

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deeds (Doc.No.788/1992 dated 06-04- 1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-081992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1,260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶244

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶245

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶246

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶247

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶248

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶249

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶250

¶251

WRIT PETITION NO: 33110/2025

¶252

Between:

¶253

SRI I.P.R. MOHAN RAJU,, S/O JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O VILLA NO.33, JAYABHERI TEMPLE TREE, NANAKRAMGUDA, HYDERABAD.

¶254

SRI I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD.

¶255

SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU,, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶256

...PETITIONER(S)

¶257

AND

¶258

THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

¶259

THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶260

CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶261

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶262

¶263

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶264

¶265

Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 which is mortagaged in favour of Respondents no. 1 and 2 for the property situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed vide Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 are situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, and to pass such

¶266

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶267

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed vide Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 are situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such

¶268

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶269

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶270

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶271

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶272

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶273

WRIT PETITION NO: 35778/2025

¶274

Between:

¶275

M TEJASWI GAYATRI, D/O. VENKATA SUBBA RAJU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032

¶276

...PETITIONER

¶277

AND

¶278

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶279

¶280

IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

¶281

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 530017

¶282

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶283

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.l and2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass

¶284

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶285

¶286

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶287

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶288

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶289

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶290

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶291

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶292

¶293

WRIT PETITION NO: 35833/2025

¶294

Between:

¶295

CHINTALAPATI KARTHIK VARMA, S/O. CHINTALAPATI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032

¶296

...PETITIONER

¶297

AND

¶298

IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

¶299

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

¶300

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶301

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus. a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass

¶302

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶303

¶304

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶305

¶306

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶307

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶308

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶309

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶310

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶311

WRIT PETITION NO: 35850/2025

¶312

Between:

¶313

M V K BANGARU RAJU, S/O. M.ANJANEYA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, FLAT NO.105, A.S.RAJU NAGAR, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD - 500017.

¶314

...PETITIONER

¶315

AND

¶316

IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

¶317

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

¶318

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶319

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass

¶320

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶325

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶326

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶327

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶328

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶329

WRIT PETITION NO: 35852/2025

¶330

Between:

¶331

CHINTALAPATI RAVINDRA VARMA,, S/O. CHINTALAPATI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032

¶332

...PETITIONER

¶333

AND

¶334

IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

¶335

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

¶336

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶337

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶338

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶339

¶340

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a)Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b)Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners.

¶341

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶342

¶343

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶344

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶345

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶346

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶347

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶348

WRIT PETITION NO: 35957/2025

¶349

Between:

¶350

M R KRISHNA GAYATHRI, D/O.M.V.SUBBA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.VILLA NO.A-32, HILL RIDGE VILLAS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- 500032.

¶351

...PETITIONER

¶352

AND

¶353

IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY

¶354

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶355

¶356

MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

¶357

CH VENKATA LAKSHMI PADMAVATI, W/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.VILLA NO.A-32, HILL RIDGE VILLAS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- 500032.

¶358

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

¶359

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶360

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus (a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, iliegal and violative of the Petitioners s rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. (b) Direct the Respondent No.l and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass

¶361

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶362

¶363

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶364

1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

¶365

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶366

1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI

¶367

2.M RAVIKUMAR

¶368

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶369

¶370

COMMON ORDER

¶371

These Writ Petitions have been filed questioning the action of the respondent Banks in not returning the original title deeds deposited with the banks for obtaining loans by creation of mortgage even after completely discharging the loan amount.

¶372

Heard Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned senior counsel, representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri M.Ravi Kumar, learned Standing counsel for respondent banks and Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation.

¶373

Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned senior counsel, while reiterating the contents of the writ affidavits would contend that the petitioners obtained loans by mortgaging their immovable property by way of deposit of their original title deeds and even after the loan amount was discharged and loan accounts were closed the respondent bank did neither returned the original title deeds nor released the mortgages by executing deed of release of mortgage on the ground that the original title documents were seized by the Central Bureau of Investigation in connection with crime. He would further contend that the petitioners are no way connected with the crime and it is the duty and responsibility of the respondent bank to take steps for getting back the original title deeds by initiating appropriate proceedings before the

¶374

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶375

¶376

competent Forum where the documents are lying and return them to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayed to allow the writ petitions.

¶377

Sri M.Ravi Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent bank, submitted that the respondent bank is ready and willing to initiate appropriate proceedings for getting back the original title deeds with the assistance of the parties and in fact the respondent bank had filed application for release of documents relating to some customer and the concerned Criminal Court allowed the said petition and ordered for release of the document.

¶378

On the other hand Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation, submitted that some of the petitioners have some role in the crime.

¶379

At this juncture, learned Senior Counsel prayed this Court to dispose of the writ petitions by recording the contentions advanced by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent bank with a direction to the respondent bank for filing appropriate applications before the concerned Court for release of the documents and the petitioners would cooperate with the bank for initiation and prosecution of the said applications.

¶380

Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel

¶381

for the parties, this Court, without going into merits or demerits of the matter

¶382

RC,J W.P.No.19501 of 2025 & batch

¶383

¶384

as to whether any of the petitioners have any connection with the crime, is inclined to dispose of the writ petitions, directing the respondent bank to take steps by filing appropriate applications/petitions before the concerned Court for release of the original title deeds with a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such, the concerned court shall dispose of the application on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶385

Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶386

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶387

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9^th July, 2026 RR Whether the order is :

¶388

  Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No   Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

Dake Sudarshan Rao v. Idbi Bank Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dake Sudarshan Rao v. Idbi Bank Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Rakheeb Vs the Union of India

M/S. Brc Constructions Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Badana Venkata Ramanamma Vs the State of Ap

Chintalapati Ravindra Varma, Vs Idbi Bank Limited

Jayabharatha Reddy Kandula Vs the Union of India

I v R Krishnam Raju Vs the Idbi Bank Limited