Dismissed¶35

Badana Venkata Ramanamma v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Jul 2026WP/28642/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal of writ petition; Article 226 writ of mandamus; alleged dispossession without due process of law; illegal, arbitrary, violation of natural justice; Sy.No.117-01, Ac.0-40 cents, Kothapeta Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District; Section 151 CPC petitions; interim order dated 01-11-2023; IA No. 1 of 2023; IA No. 1 of 2025; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; Justice Ravi Cheemalapati; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; State of AP Revenue Department; District Collector Srikakulam; RDO Tekkali; Tahasildar Kotabammali Mandal.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition; the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ¶35

Badana Venkata Ramanamma Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3332]

¶2

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026 Date of uploading :

¶3

APHC010552232023

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

WEDNESDAY, THE 8^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 28642/2023

¶10

Between:

¶11

BADANA VENKATA RAMANAMMA, W/O. LATE RAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. H.NO.202/ 1A, NEAR ANUPAMA PICTURE PALACE, KOTHAPETA VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 195

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF AP, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶15

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. A.P.

¶16

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P

¶17

THE TAHASILDAR, KOTABAMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declare the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule land in Sy.No.117-01 extent Ac.0-40 cents in Kothapeta Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of petitioner and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule land in Sy.No.117-01 extent Ac.0-40 cents in Kothapeta Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of writ petition and pass

¶23

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim order dated 01-11-2023 passed in W.P.No.28642 of 2023 and dismiss the writ petition and pass

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26