Dismissed¶32

Pasupuleti Nageswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Apr 2026WP/20240/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; W.P. No. 20240/2019; Pasupuleti Nageswara Rao v. State of A.P. and others; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on 09.04.2026 (Sumathi Jagadam, J.) following counsel's letter dated 07.04.2026; underlying challenge (mandamus under Article 226 against Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Tribunal/RDO Kovvur order dated 26-10-2019 in Case No.5 of 2019, West Godavari district) left undecided; no costs; IA under Section 151 CPC closed; counsel: Sai Gangadhar Chamarty (petitioner), Kanukolanu Sri Sai Sanjay and GP for Revenue (AP) (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, stood closed. ¶32

Pasupuleti Nageswara Rao Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010420702019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3459]

¶4

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 20240/2019

¶8

Between:

¶9

PASUPULETI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.17-85, BEHIND POCHAMMA GUDI, UNDRAJAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. AADHAAR NO.4057 7773 5482.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

THE CHAIRMAN, MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS TRIBUNAL -CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOVVUR. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶14

PASUPULETI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE NARASANNA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. UNDRAJAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶15

PASUPULETI PRABHAVATHI, W/O.P.SATYANARAYANA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. UNDRAJAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, UNDRAJAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶19

¶20

pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 26-10-2019 in case No.5 of 2019 passed by the 2nd respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice apart from provisions of Act 56/2007 and the rules 2011 made there under and consequently set aside the same and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 26-10-2019 in case No.5 of 2019 passed by the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY

¶27

2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶28

¶29

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he addressed a letter to the Registry on 07.04.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

¶31

Permission is accorded.

¶32

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

_________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶35

Dated: 09.04.2026 RSD

¶36

¶37