Disposed¶38

Ch Venkateswara Rao v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Mar 2026WP/15640/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Police interference in civil dispute; writ of mandamus; police station summons to settle private land dispute; Ac.0.011/2 cents out of Ac.0.25 cents in Survey No.239-33; Kannapparajuparva Village, Reddygudem Mandal, Krishna District; Articles 14 and 21 Constitution of India; Article 226 writ petition; I.A. No.1 of 2021 under Section 151 CPC; writ petition closed without orders on merits as grievance did not survive; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice K. Sreenivasa Reddy; decided 16 March 2026; W.P. No. 15640 of 2021.

What did the court decide?

On counsel's instruction that the petitioner is at present not being called to the Police Station, the Court found no further orders were required and closed the writ petition, recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ch Venkateswara Rao Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010269062021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3327]

¶4

MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 15640/2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

CH VENKATESWARA RAO, CHANNEELLA VENKATESWARA RAO S/O PULLAYYA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O D.NO.50/2, KANNAPPARAJUPARVA VILLAGE, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 521 215.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

A N D

¶12

THE STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶13

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM.

¶14

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZVIDU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶15

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶16

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, REDDYGUDEM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶17

MADALA RAMESH, MADALA RAMESH S/O VENKATESWARARAO AGED 50 YEARS BESIDE H NO 50/2 KANNAPPARAJUPARVA VILALGE REDDYGUDEM MANDAL

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

SRK, J W.PNo.15640 of 2021

¶20

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 4 and 5 herein in interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.6 herein by calling the Petitioner to the Police Station in order to settle the alleged disputes with regard to an extent of Ac.0.011/2 cents out of Ac.0.25 cents, in Survey No.23933, situated at Kannapparajuparva Village, Reddygudem Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.6 herein and to pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.6 herein, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

SRK, J W.PNo.15640 of 2021

¶30

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.4 and 5 in interfering with the civil disputes between the Writ Petitioner and respondent No.6 by calling the Writ Petitioner to the Police Station in order to settle the alleged disputes with regard to an extent of Ac.0.01 ½ cents out of Ac.0.25 cents in Survey No.239-33 situated at Kannapparajuparva village, Reddygudem Mandal, Krishna District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the Writ Petitioner and respondent No.6.

¶33

When the matter has come up for hearing, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner would submit that the Official respondents were calling the Writ Petitioner to the Police Station and in view of the said reason, the Writ Petition was filed. Learned counsel, on instructions, submits that at present, the Writ Petitioner has not been called to the Police Station and in view of the said reason, no further orders are required in the present Writ Petition.

¶34