Without petitioner's representation, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3209]
APHC010125842014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 14462/2014
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
NJS,J W.P No:14462 of 2014
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
NJS,J W.P No:14462 of 2014
3
The Court made the following Order:
On the earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for Dismissal”.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Date:06.03.2026 Ksj
Amabati Mary Vivekanada Devi
PRL Secy M A Dept 4 Ors
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
