Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Poola Anjaneyulu Vs Pasupuleti Subba Rao — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Andhra Pradesh HC
2026
Poola Anjaneyulu Vs Pasupuleti Subba RaoPoola Anjaneyulu v. Pasupuleti Subba Rao

Disposed¶35

Poola Anjaneyulu v. Pasupuleti Subba Rao

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Mar 2026CRP/3590/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; C.R.P. No. 3590 of 2018; decided 07.03.2026 by Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam; petitioners Poola Anjaneyulu, Poola Veera Ankamma Rao, Poola Sarojini; respondents Pasupuleti Subba Rao and seven others; counsel P Vijaya Kiran (petitioners) and Venkateswarlu Paladugu (respondents); CRP challenged order dated 19.02.2018 in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016 (I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur); closed without adjudication following settlement between parties before Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed; no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition closed in view of the settlement between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, stood closed.

Why is it important?

Recording the petitioners' counsel's submission that the matter was settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025, the Court held that no further orders were required and closed the Civil Revision Petition, with no order as to costs. ¶35

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition closed in view of the settlement between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, stood closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether any further orders were required in the Civil Revision Petition challenging the order dated 19.02.2018 in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016, given the settlement between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025.

Court's answer

Recording the petitioners' counsel's submission that the matter was settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025, the Court held that no further orders were required and closed the Civil Revision Petition, with no order as to costs.

Ratio / Principle

As a sequel to the closure of the Civil Revision Petition, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition No. 3590 of 2018 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, 07.03.2026), filed against the order dated 19.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016 before the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, was closed after counsel for the petitioners submitted that, in view of subsequent events, the matter had been settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025 and no further orders were required. No order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, stood closed as a sequel. No statute or precedent was cited and no substantive legal point was decided.

A

APHC010459732018

[3504]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3590/2018

Between:

POOLA ANJANEYULU, S/O.SIVIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

POOLA VEERA ANKAMMA RAO, S/O SIVIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION,R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

POOLA SAROJINI, W/O SIVIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

PASUPULETI SUBBA RAO, S/O LATE PEDDA VENKATA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS,R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

NALLAPATI NACHARAMRNA, W/O VENKATA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THOTA RAMANJANEYULU, S/O LATE PEDDAPULLAIH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

OBULA SIVA RAMA KOTESWAR RAO, S/O LATE GOPIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE

2

MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

TADIBOINA JANAKI RAO, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

PASUPULETI NANDESWARAMMA, W/O.SUBBARAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THOTA PAPA RAO, S/O LATE CHINNA PULLIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THOTA SIVA NAGESWAR RAO, S/O LATE CHINNA PULLIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O SUDDAPALI VILLAGE, CHEBROLE MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.P VIJAYA KIRAN

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU

3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3590 of 2018

ORDER:-

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 19.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the matter is settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025 and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter.

Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Date: 07.03.2026 KNN

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

4

144

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

C.R.P.NO:3590 of 2018

07.03.2026

KNN

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether any further orders were required in the Civil Revision Petition challenging the order dated 19.02.2018 in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016, given the settlement between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025.medium confidence¶34
The court held
Recording the petitioners' counsel's submission that the matter was settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025, the Court held that no further orders were required and closed the Civil Revision Petition, with no order as to costs.ratio¶35

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 19.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016, challenged by way of this Civil Revision Petition.¶33
I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur · 19.02.2018
Prior proceeding
Underlying suit O.S.No.323 of 2016 before the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, in which interlocutory application I.A.No.602 of 2017 arose.¶33
Prior proceeding
Subsequent event: the matter was settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025, prompting counsel to submit that no further orders were required.¶34

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
POOLA ANJANEYULU¶8
P VIJAYA KIRAN
petitioner
POOLA VEERA ANKAMMA RAO¶9
P VIJAYA KIRAN
petitioner
POOLA SAROJINI¶10
P VIJAYA KIRAN
respondent
PASUPULETI SUBBA RAO¶13
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
NALLAPATI NACHARAMRNA¶14
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
THOTA RAMANJANEYULU¶15
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
OBULA SIVA RAMA KOTESWAR RAO¶16
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
TADIBOINA JANAKI RAO¶19
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
PASUPULETI NANDESWARAMMA¶20
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
THOTA PAPA RAO¶21
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU
respondent
THOTA SIVA NAGESWAR RAO¶22
VENKATESWARLU PALADUGU

Coram

AI extract

Maheswara Rao Kuncheamauthor¶30

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Andhra Pradesh HC
Decided on: 6 Mar 2026 · March
Registered: 26 Jun 2018
Case no.: CRP/3590/2018
CNR: APHC010459732018
Bench: Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
Disposal: CLOSED NO COSTS
Case type: Civil Revision Petition

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

G. Meera Bai Vs Prl. Secy., H.E. Dept. & 2 Ors.
5 Mar 2026
Veedi Ramprasad Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh
5 Mar 2026
Kancherla Nagamani, R/o. D.No.40-809/B Vs state of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal Secretary
5 Mar 2026
M/s. Gayathri Stones Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh
6 Mar 2026
P. Suri Babu, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh
6 Mar 2026
Rashtriyalspat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Vs The Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council
6 Mar 2026

Cite this judgement

Poola Anjaneyulu v. Pasupuleti Subba Rao, CRP/3590/2018 (AP), decided on 6 March 2026.

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

Order dated 19.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.602 of 2017 in O.S.No.323 of 2016, challenged by way of this Civil Revision Petition.I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur · 19.02.2018
Underlying suit O.S.No.323 of 2016 before the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, in which interlocutory application I.A.No.602 of 2017 arose.
Subsequent event: the matter was settled between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 04.07.2025, prompting counsel to submit that no further orders were required.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Parties & counsel