Maddali Nagini Kumari v. Maddali Srinivasa Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
CMA 973/2012, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, dismissed for want of prosecution; appellant Maddali Nagini Kumari's counsel G Vijaya Babu reported no instructions; respondent Maddali Srinivasa Rao; no order as to costs; pending IAs closed; judgment per Balaji Medamalli J; coram Ravi Nath Tilhari and Balaji Medamalli JJ; dated 07.04.2026.
What did the court decide?
The C.M.A. is dismissed for want of prosecution, upon learned counsel for the appellant reporting that he has no instructions from the appellant; there shall be no order as to costs. ¶25-26