Dismissed¶34

Yadala Srujana, v. Vemuri Sarat Chand

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Apr 2026CMA/101/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMA/Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 101/2022; Yadala Srujana v. Vemuri Sarat Chand; High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati; decided 02.04.2026; per Ravi Nath Tilhari J., with Balaji Medamalli J.; impugned order dated 20-01-2022 in I.A.No.1207 of 2019 in FCOP No. 1722 of 2018, Judge Principal Family Court cum IV Additional District Judge, Vijayawada; IA No. 1 of 2022 under Section 151 CPC seeking suspension of orders dt.18-10-2019 in FCOP; parties settled all disputes out of court during pendency; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the parties having settled all their disputes out of court and the appellant's instruction to withdraw, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA No. 101/2022) is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶34

Yadala Srujana, Vs Vemuri Sarat Chand — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3572]

¶2

APHC010140792022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶8

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 101/2022

¶9

Between:

¶10

YADALA SRUJANA,, W/O VEMURI SARAT CHAND, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.32-18-1594, 1ST LINE, MALLIKARJUNAPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

VEMURI SARAT CHAND, S/o Ravindra, Hindu, Aged 34 years, R/o. D.No.9-88/3, Roy Nagar, Gannavaram, Krishna District

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Appeal Under Section_____against ordersAppellant begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Misc., Appeal having been aggrieved by the Order dated 20-01-2022 passed in I.A.No.1207 of 2019 in FCOP.No. 1722 of 2018, on the file of Judge Principal Family Court - Cum IV Additional District Judge, Vijayawada.

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the orders dt.18-10-2019 passed in F.C.O.P.No.1722 of 2018 on the file of Judge Principal Family Court — Cum — IV Addl. District Judge, at Vijayawada, pending disposal of main Appeal in the interest of justice.

¶18

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶19

¶20

1.CHETLURU SREENIVAS

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶22

¶23

The Court made the following:

¶24

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 101/2022

¶26

JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶27

Sri Chetluru Sreenivas, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted

¶28

a letter dated 23.03.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial), Andhra Pradesh High

¶29

Court, on record submitting as follows:

¶30

“ The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by my client, Yadala Srujana, impugning the order dated 20.01.2022 passed in I.A.No.1207 of 2019 in FCOP No.1722 of 2018 on the file of Judge Principal Family Court Cum IV Additional District Judge Vijayawada. During the pendency of the above case, the parties to the proceedings have settled all their disputes out of court. In view of the above, my client instructed me to withdraw the CMA.101/2022. Therefore I request you to get the above matter posted under the caption "Withdrawal".

¶31