Dismissed¶30

Smt. Sripada Srinaga Venkata Lakshmi Polamba v. Sripada Venkateswarlu

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Apr 2026CMA/81/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of civil miscellaneous appeal for want of prosecution where counsel reports no instructions; adjournments on 18.02.2025, 03.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 unavailing; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed. Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, C.M.A.No.81 of 2009, coram Ravi Nath Tilhari J and Balaji Medamalli J (judgment per Balaji Medamalli J), decided 07.04.2026. Underlying challenge: order and decree dated 31-12-2008 in OP.No. 8 of 2008, Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta; IA No. 1 of 2009 (CMAMP 196 of 2009) under Section 151 CPC for interim injunction restraining the respondent from marrying another woman.

What did the court decide?

As learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions, the C.M.A. is dismissed for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs. ¶30

Smt. Sripada Srinaga Venkata Lakshmi Polamba Vs Sripada Venkateswarlu — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010238172009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3572]

¶4

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶8

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 81/2009

¶9

Between:

¶10

SMT. SRIPADA SRINAGA VENKATA LAKSHMI POLAMBA, W/O VENKATESWARLU R/O PODAGATLAPALLI VILLAGE, RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

SRIPADA VENKATESWARLU, S/o Somanna R/o Mogalikuduru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 196 OF 2009

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim injunction against the respondent restraining him from marrying another woman pursuant to the order and decree of the Sneior Civil Judge, Kothapeta dated 31-12-2008 in OP.NO. 8 of 2008 during the pendency of this CMA, in the interest of justice

¶18

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶19

K SARVA BHOUMA RAO

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶21

P SURYA NARAYANA MURTHY

¶22

The Court made the following:

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶25

C.M.A.No.81 of 2009

¶26

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Balaji Medamalli)

¶27

On 18.02.2025, learned counsel for the appellant sought

¶28

time to obtain instructions, as the matter had been listed after a long interval. On 03.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 as well, the appeal was adjourned on the same ground.

¶29

Today, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has addressed a letter to the appellant, however, no response has been received. On this ground, he seeks an adjournment of the matter.

¶30

However, as the learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions, the C.M.A is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall

¶32

stand closed.

¶33

¶34

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

¶35

_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J

¶36

Date: 07.04.2026. Pab