Disposed¶26

Neti Ramanjaneyulu v. I.Sharada

Andhra Pradesh HC16 Jul 2026CC/5882/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Sections 10 to 12; willful violation/disobedience of order dt. 25.04.2023 in W.P.No.35140 of 2016; arrears of pension; medical reimbursement; sister issueless special case; settlement between parties; contempt case closed; no order as to costs; Andhra Pradesh High Court Amaravati Special Original Jurisdiction; Justice V. Sujatha; contemnor Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education East Godavari; petitioner Neti Ramanjaneyulu Vijayawada aged 92; counsel M L Neelima and K V Raghu Veer.

What did the court decide?

None; the contempt case was closed after the Court recorded counsel's statement that the matter had been settled between the parties, with no order as to costs. ¶26

Neti Ramanjaneyulu Vs I.Sharada — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3333]

¶2

APHC010553352023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 17^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5882/2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

NETI RAMANJANEYULU, S/O NETI VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS, R/O H.NO.24-22-12, CHAMARTIVARI STREET, DURGAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520 003

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

I SHARADA, Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Near Government Arts College, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District.

¶13

...CONTEMNOR

¶14

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the Order dt. 25-04-2023 passed in WP.No.35140 of 2016 and to pass

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶16

1.M L NEELIMA

¶17

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶18

1.K V RAGHU VEER

¶19

The Court made the following:

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶22

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5882/2023

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders dated 25.04.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.35140 of 2016, wherein this Court passed the following order:

¶25

“….In view of the same, instead of keeping this writ petition pending, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition by directing the petitioner to file fresh representation for release of arrears of pension and medical reimbursement of his sister duly enclosing relevant material like medical bills of such claim etc., within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on filing such application, the respondents are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders treating it as a special case as the petitioner’s sister does not have husband and is issueless, within a period of two (2) weeks thereafter......”

¶26

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the matter has been settled between the parties as such, no further orders are required in the contempt case. Hence, requested to close the present contempt case.

¶27