Dismissed¶42

V. Munigopal v. T. Muneeswari

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Mar 2026AS/2064/2000

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; non-representation of appellant despite duly served notice; Appeal Suit Nos. 1936 & 2064 of 2000; V. Munigopal v. Y. Sankaraiah and others; Tirupathi; OS No. 32/98; OS No. 102/91; ASJ Tirupathi; II Addl. Dist. Judge Tirupathi; decree and judgment dated 29-2-00; interim stay; IA No. 1 of 2000; CMP 12889 of 2000; Section 151 CPC; miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs; Justice V. Gopala Krishna Rao; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; judgment dated 18.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

The Appeal Suits Nos. 1936 & 2064 of 2000 are dismissed for default, the appellant having failed to prosecute the appeals despite due service of notice. ¶42

V. Munigopal Vs T. Muneeswari — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3397]

¶2

APHC010353072000

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

¶8

APPEAL SUIT NO: 1936/2000

¶9

Between:

¶10

V. MUNIGOPAL, S/O VEERAPPA CULTIVATION R/O 16/284, VALLAPAI LANE, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI TOWN,

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

Y SANKARAIAH, S/O GURAVAIAH CULTIVATION R/O 9, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUPATHI TOWNM CHITTOOR DIST.

¶14

T ROSAMMA, W/O T. RAJAGOPAL R/O 5, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUPATHI.

¶15

T MUNESWARI, D/O T. RAJAGOPAL R/O 5, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUPATHI.

¶16

P ANANDA REDDY, S/O MASTHAN REDDY PROP. OF SIMHAPURI BORDING & LODGING R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶17

SR K RAM PRASAD REDDY, R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶18

DR B BEESHAMAIAH NAIDU, S/O RAMAKRSIHNAMA NAIDU R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶19

K PRASAD NAIDU, R.M.P. DOCTOR R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶20

P PICHI REDDY, PROP. OF P.P. REDDY WINES R/O 5, KARNALA

¶21

STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶22

G RAMANA REDDY, PROP. OF GEETH PROVISIONS R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶23

M CHANDRA MODALIAR, S/O MUNUSWAMY MODALIAR R/O 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶24

Y SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY R/O D.NO. 13-1-47, PEDDAKAPU STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶25

B NARAYANA, S/O RANGA BHASHA R/O D,NO. 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶26

G MUNEIAH, R/O D,NO. 5, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶27

C JAGANADHAM, S/O CHENGAIAH R/O 313, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶28

L BHARATHI, W/O JAYACHANDRA R/O 454, KARNALA STREET, TIRUPATHI.

¶29

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶30

Appeal against the decree & judgment dt. 29-2-00 in OS No. 32/98 ( OS No. 102/91 on the file of ASJ Tirupathi ) passed by the learned II Addl. Dist. Judge, tirupathi

¶31

IA NO: 1 OF 2000(CMP 12889 OF 2000

¶32

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of operation of the judgment & decree dt. 29-2-00 in OS No. 32/98 (OS no. 102/91 on the file of the ADJ Tirupathi ) passed by the III Addl. Dist. Judge, Tirupathi pending dispsoal of the above suit

¶33

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶34

1..

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶36

1.G JAGADEESWAR

¶37

The Court made the following:

¶38

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

¶39

APPEAL SUIT Nos.1936 & 2064 of 2000

¶40

COMMON JUDGMENT:

¶41

Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court, as per the Registry endorsement, notice sent to the sole appellant has been duly served. In spite of service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeals.

¶42

Accordingly, the Appeal Suits are dismissed for default. There shall be

¶43

no order as to costs.

¶44

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶45

______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

¶46

Date.18.03.2026 CVD

V. Munigopal v. T. Muneeswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Munigopal v. T. Muneeswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y Ram Mohan Vs Nadir Basha

B Nagulaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri. Valuri Ananda Kumar Vs Smt. Veerabathini @ Valluri Saramba

Vitta Moulika Vs Vitta Ranjith Kumar

T. Rosamma Vs Y. Sankaraiah

V. Munigopal Vs Y. Sankaraiah