V. Munigopal v. Y. Sankaraiah
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, Special Original Jurisdiction; Appeal Suit Nos. 1936 and 2064 of 2000; sole appellant V. Munigopal s/o Veerappa (cultivator, Karnala Street, Tirupathi); respondents 1-15 incl. Y. Sankaraiah, T. Rosamma, T. Muneswari, P. Ananda Reddy, P. Pichi Reddy, L. Bharathi; dismissal for default / non-prosecution of appeals despite duly served notice; no order as to costs; sequel closure of miscellaneous petitions incl. IA No. 1 of 2000 (CMP 12889 of 2000) under Section 151 CPC for interim stay; underlying decree and judgment dated 29-2-2000 in O.S. No. 32/98 (earlier O.S. No. 102/91 on file of ASJ Tirupathi) by II Addl. District Judge, Tirupathi; counsel for respondents: G. Jagadeeswar (none named for appellant); coram: Justice V. Gopala Krishna Rao; judgment dated 18.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
Per the Registry endorsement, notice sent to the sole appellant had been duly served; despite service of notice there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, indicating the appellant was not inclined to prosecute the appeals.