Disposed¶58

Chinta Subramanyam, v. Apsrtc

Andhra Pradesh HC28 Aug 2025WP/9845/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APSRTC service/labour matters: writ petitions of Pothireedy Srinivasa Reddy and Chinta Subramanyam challenging orders dated 09.01.2024 in M.P.Nos.15 and 14 of 2022 in I.D.Nos.128 and 129 of 2015 of the Labour Court cum Industrial Tribunal, Guntur (Section 33-C(2), Industrial Disputes Act); Articles 14, 21 and 226 invoked; interim pleas under Section 151 CPC for payment of current wages; disposed of in view of earlier orders in W.P.Nos.2367 and 2368 of 2021; no order as to costs; IAs closed; counsel M. Pitchaiah; GP for Services II; Smt Justice Kiranmayee Mandava; decided 29.08.2025; APHC010196042024; APHC010196162024.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petitions disposed of in view of orders in W.P.Nos.2367 and 2368 of 2021, with no order as to costs and pending interlocutory applications closed. ¶58

Chinta Subramanyam, Vs Apsrtc — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3458]

¶2

APHC010196042024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 9836/2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

POTHIREEDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O VEKATESWARA REDDY, UNEMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. BOGOLU POST AND VILLAGE, ARDHAVEDU (M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

APSRTC, REP.BY ITS VICE CHARIMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, PNBS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA

¶13

THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE.

¶14

THE DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE.

¶15

THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, MARKAPUR.

¶16

LABOUR COURT CUM INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, REP.BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN, GUNTUR.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly on in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other suitable writ declaring the Order Dated 09.01.2024 in M.P 15 of 2022 in I.D 128 of 2015 on the file of 5th respondent court as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and 21 of Constitution of India and Provisions of I.D Act more particularly 33-C (2) of the Act and Consequently set aside the same and allow the M.P. as prayed for and grant costs of the proceedings and pass

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶20

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to pay current wages to me in the first week of every month pending herein in the above M.P. and pass

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶23

1.M PITCHAIAH

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶25

¶26

APHC010196162024

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3458] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶29

PRESENT

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶31

WRIT PETITION NO: 9845/2024

¶32

Between:

¶33

CHINTA SUBRAMANYAM,, S/O. NAGAIAH, UNEMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 36 YEAIRS, R/O. CHANDRA REDDYPALLI, KONGALAVEDI, GIDDALURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

¶34

...PETITIONER

¶35

AND

¶36

APSRTC, REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, PNBS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA

¶37

THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE.

¶38

THE DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE.

¶39

THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, MARKAPUR.

¶40

LABOUR COURT CUM INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, REP.BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN, GUNTUR.

¶41

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶42

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶43

¶44

pleased topleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly on in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other suitable writ declaring the Order Dated 09.01.2024 in M.P 14 of 2022 in I.D 129 of 2015 on the file of 5th respondent court as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and 21 of Constitution of India and Provisions of I.D Act more particularly 33-C (2) of the Act and Consequently set aside the same and allow the M.P. as prayed for and grant costs of the proceedings and pass

¶45

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶46

¶47

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶48

1.M PITCHAIAH

¶49

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶50

1.GP FOR SERVICES II

¶51