A. Suman Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

A. Suman Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposal in terms of the orders passed by the Division Bench in W.P. Nos. 23101 of 2021 and batch dated 15.07.2025; the substantive terms of relief lie in that appended order and are not restated in this common order.

Issue for consideration

Whether the removal of the petitioners from service as Home Guards without conducting an enquiry was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution and principles of natural justice, entitling them to reinstatement/re-enrolment. +1 more

Ratio / Principle

All seven writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 23101 of 2021 and batch, dated 15.07.2025, and there shall be no order as to costs; the merits were not independently adjudicated in this order.

Key takeaways

The Registry is directed to append a copy of the order in W.P. Nos. 23101 of 2021 and batch, dated 15.07.2025, to this order.ratio¶¶168
As a sequel to the disposal, all pending miscellaneous applications in these writ petitions shall stand closed.ratio¶¶169

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Home Guards — removal from service without enquiry — common order disposing seven writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 12777, 9638, 12859, 12886, 12935 of 2021; 24050 & 30798 of 2022) filed by ex-/removed Home Guards of the Chittoor, Krishna, Kakinada, Tirupathi, Guntur, West Godavari and Eluru units against removal orders (27.07.2009 to 27.02.2020) and consequential rejection of reinstatement/re-enrolment claims, alleged to be violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 and principles of natural justice and of Rule 7(4) of the A.P. Home Guards Rules / Rule 7(3)-(5) of the Madras Home Guards Rules — both counsel jointly submitted that the issue stood covered by the Division Bench decision in W.P. Nos. 23101 of 2021 & batch dated 15.07.2025 — writ petitions disposed of in terms of that order; no order as to costs; Registry directed to append a copy of the Division Bench order; pending miscellaneous applications closed. (Justice Kiranmayee Mandava, 28.08.2025)

1

[3458]

APHC010223072021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 12777/2021

Between:

K.PAVAN KUMAR, S/O LATE K, NAGARAJA SARMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC - EX-HOME GUARD WITH NO 339 OF MADANAPALLE HOME GUARD UNIT R/O D NO 3-142-1, BAZAAR STREET, GURRAMKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL - 517 291, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH..

...PETITIONER

AND

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (LEGAL II) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522 503, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI - 522 502, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, . HOME GUARDS, ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI - 522 502, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR - 517 001 ANDHRA PRADESH...

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the

2

nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondent authorities in issuing impugned removal order. in in D.O. No. 3/2014 (C. No. B3/HGs/ 2943/2013) dated 01.02.2014, passed by The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor removing the petitioner from the. service of the Home Guards and consequential proceedings Re. No. 353/HGs-Esst/2019-3 dated 19.03.2021 of 3,-d respondent as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to Principles of Natural Justice, apart from violative of Rule 7 (4) of the A.P. Home Guards Rules and the same liable to be set aside and consequently set aside the impugned rejection order in Re. No. 363/HGs-Esst/2019-3 dated 19.03.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent by re-enrolling the petitioner with all consequential benefits at the earliest

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned rejection order Rc. No. 353/HGs-Esst/20193 dated 19.03.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent by re-enrolling the petitioner with all consequential benefits at the earliest and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 9638/2021

Between:

A. SUMAN, S/O LATE A. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC - EX-HOME GUARD NO 385 MADANAPALLE HOME GUARD UNIT R/O EGUVA AMILEPALLI, H/O DIGUVA AMILEPALLI, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT..

...PETITIONER

AND

THE STATE OF AP, THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME (LEGAL II)

3

DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI - 525 503, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GOVERNMENT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI - 522 502 GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HOME GUARDS, , GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI - 522 502, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR - 517 001 ANDHRA PRADESH..

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondent authorities in rejecting the petitioner s case for reinstatement vide Memo Rc. No. 310/HGs.Estt 2019 15 dated 10.02.2021 as Home Guard is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Art 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and the same is liable to be set aside and consequently direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for re enrolment as Home Guard with immediate effect

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for re-enrolment as Home Guard forthwith

IA NO: 2 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the petitioner for amendent of prayer by including the "Memo No. 310/HGs.Estt/2019-11 dated 13-02-2020" before "memo Rc. 310/HG.Esst/2019-2015 dated 10-02-2021

Counsel for the Petitioner:

4

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR HOME

2.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 12859/2021

Between:

MALLELA CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O M. RAMACHANDRUDU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC . EX-HOME GUARD WITH NO 335 OF CHITTOOR HOME GUARD UNIT R/O D NO 9-303 B, KUMMARI STREET, VEMPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL - 516 329, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH..

...PETITIONER

AND

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (LEGAL II) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522 503, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HOME GUARDS, ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI - 522 502, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME GUARDS, ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA 520 010, KRISHNA DISTRICT

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR - 517 001 ANDHRA PRADESH...

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondent authorities in issuing impugned removal order.in D.O. No. 31/2007-B7/HG/48/2009 dated 27.07.2009 passed by the 4th respondent and consequential order in rejecting the dim of the petitioner for reinstatement in to service in Re. No. 336/HGs

5

Estt/212-04 dated 05.03.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art .14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to Principles of Natural Justice, apart from violative of Rule 7 (4) of the A.P. Home Guards Rules and the same liable to be set aside and consequently set aside the impugned removal order Re. No. 336/HGs Estt/212-04 dated 05.03.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent by re-enrolling the petitioner with all consequential benefits at the earliest and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to set aside the impugned removal order Rc. No. 336/HGs Estt/212-04 dated 05.03.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent by re-enrolling the petitioner with all consequential benefits at the earliest and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 12886/2021

Between:

C BHASKAR REDDY, S/O C.SIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), RESIDENT OF CHEEPATIVARIPALLI, MALLECHERUVU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (HOME GUARDS), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME GUARDS, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

6

THE COMMANDANT, 0/0 THE COMMANDANT OF HOME GUARDS, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in removing the petitioner vide his Proceedings D.O.No.12/2018 (B7/HGs/1722/ 14/2016), dated 31-01-2018 from the rolls of Home Guards Organization for his unauthorized absent for three months from 01-12-2015 in contrary to Rule 7 (3) (4) and (5) of the Madras Home Guards Rules is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to reinstate the petitioner into service as Home Guard by duly suspending the orders in D.O.No.12/2018 (137/HGs/1722/ 14/2016), dated 31-01-2018 of the 5th respondent, pending disposal of this writ petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.VUTUPALLI RAJANNA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 12935/2021

Between:

B. BALAKOTI NAIK, S/O MANGYA NAIK AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC - EX-HOME GUARD NO 330, HOME GUARD UNIT, R/O AS RAMARAO HOUSE, BANDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH..

7

...PETITIONER

AND

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HOME GUARDS, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT..

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondent authorities in issuing impugned removal order in C. No. 5060/H1/2019 D.O. No. 11/2020 dated 27.02.2020, issued by the.3rd respondent removing the petitioner from the service of the Home Guards as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to Principles of Natural Justice, apart from violative of Rule 7 (4) of the A.P. Home Guards Rules and the same is liable to be set aside, and consequently set aside the impugned removal order in C. No. 5060/H1/2019 D.O. No. 11/2020 dated 27.02.2020, issued by the 3rd respondent duly re-enrolling the petitioner as Home Guard at the earliest

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned removal order in C. No. 5060/H1/2019 D.O. No. 11/2020 dated 27.02.2020, issued by the 3rd respondent duly re-enrolling the petitioner as Home Guard at the earliest

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

8

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 24050/2022

Between:

KESAVARAPU CHANDRA SEKHAR, ,(HG.682) S/O SANYASIRAO, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.9176/1, THOTASTREET, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD. PRATHIPADU, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

KUNIKESAVA,(HG.531), S/O SESHACLRI, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.7-57/A, JANARDHAN COLONY,VIDYA NAGAR, S.V. POST, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

B.SAHAYAM., (HG.1229) S/O BALAYYA, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.1-8A, VELUR,PICHATURMANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

MURARIROSAIAH,, (HG.479) S/O BODCBBA, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.13, GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE,197RAMAPURAM POST GUDIPALAMMANDAL,CHITOOR DISTRICT.

B.CHITTIBABU,, (HG.1098) SIC) BABU, AGED 38 YEARS. OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.18-15, KATTAKINDHAPALLI, G.D.NELLOREMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

A. SURESHBABU,, (HG.549) S/O APPARAO, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.D.NO.1-128, PEDDASTREET, JALLAPALLI VILLAGE, NARSIPRAM POST NANDIGAMMANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

YATAMVENKATESH,, (HG.861) S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.FLAT NO.87,D.NO.55-3-3 AVSN COLONY, PALAKOLLU VILLAGE AND MANDRIL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

VELUGUBANTIBHASKAR, (HG.716) S/O NAGARAJU, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC. HOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O.H.NO. 4-48, VEGAVARAM POST, JANGAREDDYGUDEMMANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. PETITIONER NO.8 WITHDRAWN AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 06.05.2025 IN WP 24050/22 IN THE PETITION

9

...PETITIONER(S)

AFFIDAVIT.

AND

THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE ADDL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME GUARDS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE COMMANDANT OF HOME GUARDS, VISHAKHAPATNAM, VISHAKA DISTRICT.

THE COMMANDANT OF HOME GUARDS, KARNOOL, KARNOOL DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, URBAN POLICE,TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITOOR DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELLIN' DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings, 1) D.O.No.17/2017, C.No.6324/H1/2017, dated 06.07.2017, 2) D.O.No.4/2012,RC.No.B7/HGs/442/1/2012 dated 03.02.2012 3. D.O.No.6/2010, B7/HGs/7/2010, dated 08.02.2010, 4) D.O.No.34/2009, C.No.B7/HG/79/2009, dated 20.10.2009, 5) D.O.No.02/2013,

10

C.No.B3/26/I814/13, dated 29.08.2013, 6) D.O.No.16/2010, R.No.B7/HGs/42/10, dated 05.05.2010,7) C.No.9188/H1/2009, dated Nil/12/2009, 8)D.O.No.35/2014, C.No.445/H1/2014 dated 05.11.2014, on the file of the respective respondents, in removing the petitioners from service as Home Guards as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, incompetent, against the principles of natural justice and accordingly set aside the same and consequently direct the respective respondents to reinstate the petitioners into service as Home Guards and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings, 1) D.O.No.17/2017. C.No.6324/H1/2017, dated 06.07.2017, 2) D.O.No.4/2012,RC.No.B7/HGs/442/1/2012, dated 03.02.2012, 3) D.O.No.6/2010, B7/1-1Gs/7/2010, dated 08.02.2010, 4) D.O.No .34/2009. C.No.B7/HG/79/2009, dated 20.10.2009, 5) D.O.No.02/2013, C.No.B3/26/1814/13, dated 29.08.2013, 6) D.O.No.16/2010, R.No.B7/HGs/42/10, dated 05.05.2010,7) C.No.9188/H1/2009, dated Nil/12/2009, 8)D.O.No.35/2014, C.No.445/H1/2014 dated 05.11.2014, on the file of the respective respondents, by directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioners into service as Home Guards and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

2.K V SESHAGIRI RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

WRIT PETITION NO: 30798/2022

Between:

VELPURIKOTIVEERAIH, ,(HG.356) SIO VENKATSWARLLU, AGED 31 YEARS, OCCHOME GUARD (REMOVED), R/O, CHINA KONDRUPADU VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, GUNTURDISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

11

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE ADDL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME GUARDS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE COMMANDANT OF HOME GUARDS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE URBAN, GUNTUR,GUNTURDISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings, D.O.No.175/2018, C.No.8962/H1/2017-18 dated 27.03.2018, on the file of the 4th respondent, in removing the petitioner from service as Home Guard as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, incompetent, against the principles of natural justice and accordingly set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Home Guard and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings, D.O.No.175/2018, C.No.8962/H1/2017-18, dated 27.03.2018, on the file of the 4th respondents, by directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Home Guard and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

12

COMMON ORDER:

Heard K. Srinivasa Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondent(s).

The Writ Petitions are filed against the proceedings of the respondents in removing the petitioner(s) from service, who were working as ‘Home guards’ in the respondent department, without conducting an enquiry.

Both the learned counsel submit that the issue involved in these

cases is covered by the decision of Division Bench of this Court in W.P. Nos.23101 of 2021 & batch, dated 15.07.2025, and requests that the same order may be passed in these Writ Petitions.

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P. Nos.23101 of 2021 and batch, dated 15.07.2025. There shall be no order as to costs.

The Registry is directed to append a copy of the order in

W.P. Nos. 23101 of 2021 and batch, dated 15.07.2025, to this order.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Date: 28.08.2025 MVK

13

441

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NOS:12777, 9638, 12859, 12886, 12935 of 2021, 24050 &

30798 of 2022

Date:28.08.2025 MVK

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
K. Pavan Kumar¶¶10
K. Srinivasa Prasad
petitioner
A. Suman¶¶29
K. Srinivasa Prasad
petitioner
Mallela Chandrasekhar¶¶52
K. Srinivasa Prasad
petitioner
C. Bhaskar Reddy¶¶71
Vutupalli Rajanna
petitioner
B. Balakoti Naik¶¶90
K. Srinivasa Prasad
petitioner
Kesavarapu Chandra Sekhar (HG.682)¶¶108
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
Kunikesava (HG.531)¶¶109
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
B. Sahayam (HG.1229)¶¶110
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
Murari Rosaiah (HG.479)¶¶111
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
B. Chittibabu (HG.1098)¶¶112
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
A. Sureshbabu (HG.549)¶¶113
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
Yatam Venkatesh (HG.861)¶¶114
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
Velugubanti Bhaskar (HG.716)¶¶115
K. Srinivasa Prasad, K V Seshagiri Rao
petitioner
Velpuri Kotiveeraih (HG.356)¶¶143
K. Srinivasa Prasad
respondent
The Government of Andhra Pradesh / The State of Andhra Pradesh (Principal Secretary, Home Department)¶¶13
GP FOR SERVICES I, GP FOR HOME
respondent
The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh¶¶14
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Additional Director General of Police, Home Guards, Andhra Pradesh¶¶15
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Inspector General of Police, Home Guards, Andhra Pradesh¶¶57
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada¶¶96
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Commandant, Home Guards, Kurnool¶¶78
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Commandant of Home Guards, Visakhapatnam¶¶122
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District¶¶16
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada¶¶124
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Urban Police, Tirupathi¶¶125
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Eluru¶¶127
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Bhimavaram¶¶129
GP FOR SERVICES I
respondent
The Superintendent of Police (Urban), Guntur¶¶150
GP FOR SERVICES I

Coram

AI extract

Justice Kiranmayee Mandavaauthor¶¶170