Gudimetla Sathi Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Land Acquisition – Utilization of land without acquisition or compensation – Mandamus under Article 226
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; W.P. No.9307 of 2023; decided 03.12.2025 by Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao. Keywords: utilization of land without land acquisition; payment of compensation; rehabilitation and resettlement benefits; Musurumilli Canal; Polavaram Irrigation Project; Left Main Canal; RFCTLARR Act 2013; writ of mandamus; Article 226; Articles 14, 21 and 300-A; Sy.No.142 Indukuru Revenue Village; Devipatnam Mandal; Alluri Seetharamaraju District (formerly East Godavari); Ac.2.33 cents and Ac.1.52 cents; counter-affidavit of respondent No.4; budget sanction under Head of Account 4700-03-240-11-530-532VN; enquiry report dated 13.12.2022 by Tahsildar (5th respondent); Section 151 CPC applications (IA Nos. 1 & 2 of 2023, IA No.1 of 2025); writ disposed of directing payment of compensation; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Respondent authorities directed to pay compensation to the petitioners for the utilized lands (Ac.2.33 cents and Ac.1.52 cents, Sy.No.142, Indukuru Revenue Village, Devipatnam Mandal) as expeditiously as possible in accordance with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed as a sequel; no order as to costs.