Dismissed¶31

M/s. Bhanu Wines, v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Dec 2025WP/2346/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court (Amaravati), W.P. No. 2346 of 2025, M/s. Bhanu Wines v. State of A.P. — writ petition challenging allotment of additional IMFL/FL wine shop in Veeraballi Mandal, Annamayya District (Arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 21; natural justice) dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's absence; no merits decided; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Despite the writ petition being listed for dismissal, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, indicating that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. ¶30

M/s. Bhanu Wines, Vs the State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3330]

¶2

APHC010044052025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2346 of 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/S. BHANU WINES,, SHOP SITUATED AT SY.NO.532/B1, PLOT NO.26, RAYACHOTY TO VEERABALLE MAIN ROAD, VEERABALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI NERUSUPALLI ANJANEYULU REDDY, S/O.NAGI REDDY

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶15

THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER/LICENSING AUTHORITY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, AT RAYACHOTY.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in allotting additional IMFL and FL Wine Shop in Veeraballi Mandal, Annamayya

¶18

¶19

District, which is opposed to Article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 of the Constitution of India and opposed to Principles of Natural Justice, set-aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents not to allot Additional IMFL and FL Wine Shop in Veeraballi Mandal, Annamayya District

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to issue Notification for alloting the Additional IMFL and FL Wine Shop in Veeraballi Mandal, Annamayya District, pending disposal of the main writ petition

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶23

1.B PARAMESEWARA RAO

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶25

1.GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.2346 of 2025

¶29

ORDER:-

¶30

Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption 8for dismissal9, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.

¶31