Disposed¶23

Pasupuleti Venkateswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Jul 2025WP/7935/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC W.P. No. 7935 of 2025, disposed 11.07.2025 by Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J. Petitioner: Pasupuleti Venkateswara Rao; Respondents: State of A.P. (PR&RD Secretariat), District Collector Krishna, CEO Zilla Praja Parishad Krishna, MPDO Challapalli. Disposed on counsel's instruction that the petitioner's representation dated 22.02.2025 (Ex.P.2) was considered and action taken; no costs; interlocutory applications closed. No statutes or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is disposed of, no further consideration being necessary in view of the petitioner's counsel's statement (on instructions) that the representation dated 22.02.2025 (Ex.P.2) has been considered and necessary action taken; no order as to costs. ¶23

Pasupuleti Venkateswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010153652025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 7935 OF 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

PASUPULETI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/o.Naga Bushanam, aged about 62 years, R/o.D.No.16-135, Challapalli, Kota Eduruga Challapalli, Krishna District.

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶13

The District Collector, Krishna District, Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam.

¶14

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Praja Parishad, Krishna, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.

¶15

The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Challapalli Mandal, Challapalli, Krishna District.

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE

¶19

¶20

The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:

¶21

Heard Sri Ghantasala Udaya Bhaskar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner; Sri P. Chaitanya Srinivas, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for ZPPs, MPPs and Gram Panchayat; Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development.

¶22

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 22.02.2025 (Ex.P.2) has been considered and necessary action has been taken. He would, therefore, submit that no further consideration is necessary.

¶23