M/S. Raja reddy constructions, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶16

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶19

1.DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶21

1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

¶22

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

¶23

2

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

ORAL ORDER:

¶26

Heard Ms. Devasri Roshan K, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development and Finance Planning.

¶27

Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development and Finance Planning has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, PIU (PR) Division, Badvel, dated 10.07.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Payment Summary in the Written Instructions would indicate that the total value of work done by the Writ Petitioner is Rs.39,69,046/-. The Quality Control Recovery is for an amount of Rs.6,16,109/-, and that the balance amount due to the Petitioner is of Rs.33,52,937/-.

¶28

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, having taken instructions from her client, is agreeable to accept the balance amount of Rs.33,52,937/- as full and final settlement on the condition that the said due amount may be directed to be remitted to the Writ Petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

¶29

Having regard to the above facts, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, directing the Official Respondents to pay a sum of Rs.33,52,937/- as full and final settlement within a period of sixteen (16) weeks from today, by completing all the inter-departmental and intradepartmental administrative process by cooperation and coordination between all the concerned departments and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks thereafter.

¶30

Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the bank account details to the Competent Authority forthwith, for effective compliance.

¶31

3

¶32

With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed to the extent indicated. No order as to costs.

¶33

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

¶34

______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

¶35

Date: 11.07.2025 Vns

M/S. Raja reddy constructions, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Raja reddy constructions, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kakarla Padmavathi Vs G.N.G. Ramadas

Alla Salomi Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Palam Nasaraiah Vs the Acharya Nagarjuna University

Gandikota Rama Subbaiah Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Pasupuleti Venkateswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

T Gangadhara Rao Vs Smt a Thameem Ansariya IAS