Vankayalapati Venkata Surendra Babu @ v. SurendrababuV S Babu v the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; Writ Petition 3660/2019; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of mandamus; alleged police and revenue-official interference and harassment at Ongole, Prakasam District; official respondents 3–7 (DGP, SP, DySP, RDO, Tahsildar); private respondents 9–11 (Muvva Ramaseshagiri Rao, Muvva Sreenivasa Rao, Muvva Jayasree); Assistant Government Pleader for Home: no report received, no interference, no steps contemplated under Section 145 Cr.P.C.; petitioner's counsel sought closure; petition closed at stage of admission without merits; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; decided 11.08.2025.
What did the court decide?
On the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home (that the police did not interfere in the matter, never contemplated initiating proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C., and never harassed the petitioner and his family members) and of learned counsel for the petitioner that no further orders were required, the Court closed the writ petition at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case.