Dismissed¶31

Mannuru Malyadri, v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Aug 2025WP/4733/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; Article 226 mandamus; police station summons; pressure to pay amounts; empty/blank promissory notes and cheques; Podalakuru Police Station; Chejarla Police Station; SPSR Nellore District; Superintendent of Police Nellore; Circle Inspector Podalakuru; Sub-Inspector Chejarla; N Suresh Naidu; State of Andhra Pradesh Home Department; Section 151 CPC interim application; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; dated 07.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause did not survive for further adjudication, the Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶31

Mannuru Malyadri, Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010105692019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3368]

¶5

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4733/2019

¶8

Between:

¶9

MANNURU MALYADRI,, S/O. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. G4, A-BLOCK, PAVANI TOWERS, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶10

MANNURU VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. MALYADRI, AGED ABOIUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. G4, A-BLOCK, PAVANI TOWERS, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

¶14

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶15

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODALAKURU POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶16

THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEJARLA POLICE STATION, CHEJARLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶17

¶18

N SURESH NAIDU, S/O.DEVARAJULU, R/O.TURPUGAGAVARAM VILLAGE, THALLURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and pressurizing the petitioners to pay the amounts and pressurizing to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and not to pressurize the petitioners to pay the amounts and not to pressurize to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondent and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and not to pressurize the petitioners to pay the amounts and not to pressurize to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondents and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶24