Dismissed¶¶32

Smt. T. Suneetha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Dec 2025WP/20081/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; Writ Petition No. 20081 of 2019; T. Suneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others; Adult Education Department; Deputy Director, Sakshara Bharathi Samithi; abetment of suicide; departmental action; writ of mandamus; Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226 of the Constitution; Section 151 CPC; IA No. 1 of 2019; representation dated 06-09-2019; dismissal as infructuous; no order as to costs; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; decided 08-12-2025.

What did the court decide?

On the recorded submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and has become infructuous, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶¶32

Smt. T. Suneetha, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3368]

¶2

APHC010416842019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20081/2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

SMT. T. SUNEETHA,, W/O. LATE ESHWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, INDIRA NAGAR, D.NO. 1/4/61, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶12

THE DIRECTOR, ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, B- BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ANJENEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶13

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURDISTRICT.

¶14

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ADULT EDUCATION, SAKSHARA BHARATHI SAMITHI OFFICE. ANANTHAPUR.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1S1 and 2'd respondent in not take any departmental action against the abettors till today, who drive petitioner husband to commit suicide in the 4the respondent office as illegal, discriminatory, violative of principles of natural justice, fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass

¶17

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 6-9-2019 and take necessary action on the abettors pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

¶27

WRIT PETITION No.20081 of 2019

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Ms. B. Sofiea, learned counsel representing Sri Sridhar Tummalapudi, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶30

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education is in

¶31

attendance.

¶32

Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in

¶34

this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶35

______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

¶36

8th December, 2025 cbn

¶37

¶38

¶39

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI