Disposed¶24

Company Secy, M/S. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemica v. Secy, Aperc, Hyderabad & 4 Others

Andhra Pradesh HC13 Jul 2025WP/17787/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; WP No. 17787 of 2014; M/S. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemica vs Secy APERC, APSPDCL, Superintending Engineer and Senior Accounts Officer Kurnool, Govt. of A.P.; decided 14.07.2025 by Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad; cause does not survive; writ petition disposed of; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petition was disposed of as its cause does not survive, with no order as to costs, and interlocutory applications, if any, were closed. ¶24

Company Secy, M/S. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemica Vs Secy, Aperc, Hyderabad & 4 Others — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010318602014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 17787 OF 2014

¶8

Between:

¶9

COMPANY SECY, M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA ALKALIES & ALLIED CHEMICA, Having Regd Office at Gondiparla Village,Kurnool Dist Rep by its company secretary, sri V.Radhakrishna Murthy R/o. Hyderabad.

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

SECY APERC HYDERABAD, rep. by its Secretary, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Southern Power Distribution Company of A P, Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Tirupati,Chitoor Dist.

¶14

The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, at Kurnool.

¶15

The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, at Kurnool.

¶16

Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep, by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Energy Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶17

...Respondents

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: J SRINADH REDDY

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL

¶20

¶21

The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:

¶22

Heard Ms. M. Parichaya Reddy, learned Counsel appearing through online representing Sri J. Srinadh Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. A. Jyothi Ratna, learned Counsel appearing for Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL.

¶23

Ms. M. Parichaya Reddy, learned Counsel appearing through online representing Sri J. Srinadh Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the cause does not survive in the present Writ Petition.

¶24

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no Order as to costs.

¶25

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order.

¶26

______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

Dt: 14.07.2025 JKS

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶31

WRIT PETITION No. 17787 OF 2014

¶32

14.07.2025

¶33

JKS

Company Secy, M/S. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemica v. Secy, Aperc, Hyderabad & 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Company Secy, M/S. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemica v. Secy, Aperc, Hyderabad & 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Raja reddy constructions, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Gandikota Rama Subbaiah Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Pasupuleti Venkateswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

V. Ramakrishna Reddy, Vs Prl.Secy., Energy Dept., Hyd., & 5 Others

C Venkata Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Reliance Communication Ltd, Hyd & Another Vs Md, Apspdcl, Guntur Dist & 2 Others