Dismissed¶34

V Sunkamma v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Sept 2025WP/17100/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No.17100 of 2023; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao; dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal permitted; no order as to costs; revenue records rectification; Disputed Survey Numbers; Survey No.200 1 B / Survey No.200 B 1; Ac 0-94 Cents; Pamidi Village, Pamidi Mandal, Anantapur District; Report Rc.No.B/130/2021 dt.30.04.2021; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; State of Andhra Pradesh; District Collector Anantapur; Revenue Divisional Officer Guntakal; Tahsildhar Pamidi Mandal; V Sunkamma.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ¶34

V Sunkamma Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010332252023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3330]

¶4

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 17100/2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

V SUNKAMMA, W/O V.SHANKAR, AGED. 63 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O 12-479, P.KONDAPURAM, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶13

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

¶14

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

¶15

THE TAHSILDHAR, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of Respondents 3 to 4 in carrying out rectifications in Revenue Records with respect to Petitioner's Agriculture Land admeasuring an extent of Ac 0-94 Cents in Survey No.200 1 B situated at Pamidi Village, Pamidi Mandal, Anantapur District there by deleting the Petitioner's Lands from Disputed Survey Numbers as illegal, arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to rectify the Revenue Records there by removing the Petitioner's Agriculture Land admeasuring an extent of Ac 0-94 Cents in Survey No.200 1 B situated at Pamidi Village, Pamidi Maridal, Anantapur District from the Caption of Disputed Survey Numbers and pass

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the

¶20

¶21

High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to take appropriate action in pursuance of Report Rc.No.B/130/2021 dt.30.04.2021 submitted by Respondent No.4 for rectifying the Revenue Records there by removing the Petitioner's Agriculture Land admeasuring an extent of Ac 0¬94 Cents in Survey No.200 1 B situated at Pamidi Village, Pamidi Mandal, Anantapur District from the Caption of Disputed Survey Numbers and pass

¶22

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission for amending the Paras 2, 3, 4 of Affidavit filed in support of Writ Petition, Main Prayer Portion of Writ Petition, Interim Prayer Portion of Interlocutory Application in WP.No.17100 of 2023 on the file of this Hon'ble Court for inserting actual Survey No.200 B 1 by deleting wrongly mentioned Survey No.200 1 B and to pass

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 17100 of 2023

¶30