Dismissed¶33

Chinna Kullai Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Sept 2025WP/14762/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010286602023 | AP High Court Amaravati | W.P. No. 14762 of 2023 | Chinna Kullai Reddy & Anr. v. State of A.P. & Ors. | Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao | 04.09.2025 | assignment cancellation by RDO Ananthapuramu, Proc. D.Dis.No.D2(B)/3715/2022 dt. 05.06.2023, natural justice challenge | writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs, IAs closed | no merits adjudicated, no precedent value on the underlying dispute.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications (including IA No. 1 of 2023) stood closed as a sequel. ¶33

Chinna Kullai Reddy Vs The State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010286602023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3330]

¶4

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 14762/2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

CHINNA KULLAI REDDY, S/O. KULLAI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. JANGAMREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, NARAPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRI.

¶10

K. VARALAKSHMI, W/O. KULLAI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. JANGAMREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, NARAPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRAEDESH STATE.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, NARPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

¶17

K NARESH, S/O. PEDDANNA, R/O. THUMPERA H/O. GUGUDU VILLAGE, NARPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in cancelling the assignment vide Proceedings D.Dis.No.D2(B)/3715/2022, dated. 05.06.2023 of the petition without hearing the petitioners, without conducting proper enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and to pass

¶20

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings D.Dis.No.D2(B)/3715/2022, dated. 05.06.2023 of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶24

1.K SRINIVAS

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 14762 of 2023

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Sri A.Aravind Reddy, learned counsel representing on behalf of

¶31

Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and also endorsed the same on the bundle.

¶32

Permission is accorded.

¶33

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There

¶34

shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶36

___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶37

Date: 04.09.2025