Dismissed¶27

Pothuri Subbaiah, v. Yadam Balaji

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Sept 2025CRP/1342/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP 1342/2025, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, decided 04.09.2025; Article 227 revision against order/decree dated 26.03.2025 in E.P.No.314 of 2019 in O.S.No.49 of 2015, I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District; dismissed as infructuous on petitioner counsel's submission; no costs; pending IAs closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and pending interlocutory applications stand closed. ¶27

Pothuri Subbaiah, Vs Yadam Balaji — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3330]

¶2

APHC010269652025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶7

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1342/2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

POTHURI SUBBAIAH, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.19-7-25, OPPVENKATESWARASWAMI TEMPLE, SRINIVASANAGAR, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER AND

¶11

YADAM BALAJI, S/o.Chinna Rosaiah, Aged about 40 years, Hindu, Occ- Business, R/o.Perala, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the Revision Petition is being preferred aggrieved by the order and decree dated 26.03.2025 passed in E.P.No.314 of 2019 in O.S.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the court of Learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶14

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.314 of 2019 in O.S.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the court of Learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶17

1.NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶19

¶20

The Court made the following:

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1342 of 2025

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in

¶25

the revision petition does not survive and it has become infructuous,

¶26

hence, prayed to dismiss the revision petition.

¶27

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.

¶29

___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Date: 04.09.2025

SPP

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO

¶34