Dismissed¶55

M.Anand Naik @M.a,Naik, v. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Andhra Pradesh HC11 Aug 2025WP/12567/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition for non-prosecution; Article 226 certiorari against Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Anantapuramu decision in I.D. No. 100 of 2014 dated 30-6-2017; APSRTC contract conductor (E.No.947728) terminated by order dated 25-1-2013 by Depot Manager, Alipiri Depot, Tirupati; prayer for reinstatement; no appearance by petitioner or counsel on hearing date or previous adjournment; dismissed without costs; pending interlocutory applications closed; Justice B V L N Chakravarthi; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; W.P. No. 12567 of 2019; decided 12-08-2025.

What did the court decide?

There was no representation for the petitioner on the date of hearing or on the previous adjournment, though the matter was posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. ¶53

M.Anand Naik @M.a,Naik, Vs The Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

O: ' >

I
!

APHC010273072019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 12567 OF 2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

M.Anand Naik @M.A,Naik,, S/o Soma Naik, Aged about 40 years, E.No.947728, Contract Conductor, Gundle Guttajhanda Sarimedugu (Post) Gurrainkonda (Mandal) Chittoor District.

¶11

...Petitioner

¶12

AND

¶13

The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep.by its Managing Director, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶14

The Depot Manager, APSRTC. Alipiri Depot Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Dy Chief Traffic Manager, APSRTC Tirupathi, Chittoor^District. 4. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5. The Chairperson cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-L^abour Court, Anantapuramu.

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Direction or an Order which particularly in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for the records pertaining^{totheIDNo.100} of 2014 dated 30-6-2017 on the file of the Chairperson cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court Anantapuramu and^setasidethe same

¶17

/ in ^6 far, as it went against the petitioner in terminating^{theservicesofthe}

¶18

r petitioner order dated 25-1-20-13 by the respondent as -illegal, arbitrary

¶19

. and contrary to the evidence on record and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BHASKAR GANDHAM

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC)

¶22

The Court made the following order:

¶23

APHC010273072019

¶24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶25

[3368]

¶26

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶27

TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶28

PRESENT

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 12567/2019

¶31

Between:

¶32

1.M.ANAND NAIK @MANAIK,, S/0 SOMA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, E.N0.947728, CONTRACT CONDUCTOR, GUNDLE GUTTA,THANDA SARIMEDUGU (POST) GURRAINKONDA (MANDAL) CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶33

...PETITIONER

¶34

AND

¶35

1.THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶36

2.THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC. ALIPIRI DEPOT TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶37

3.THE DY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, APSRTC TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶38

4.THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶39

5.THE CHAIRPERSONCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPURAMU ...RESPONDENT(S):

¶40

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶41

1.BHASKAR GANDHAM

¶42

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶43

VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following:

¶44

¶45

<<■

¶46

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

¶47

WRIT PETITION No.12567 OF 20119

¶48

(

¶49

ORDER:

¶50

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶51

India for the following relief:

¶52

•‘....to issue a Writ or Direction or an Order which particularly in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for the records pertaining to the I.D No. 100 of 2014 dated 30-62017 on the file of the Chairperson cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court Anantapuramu and^set aside the same in so far as it went against the petitionerⁱⁿ terminating the services of the petitioner order dated^25-1- 2013 by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the evidence on record and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service and pass...”

¶53

None appeared for the writ petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment.

¶54