K.Vinay, West Godavari Dt & Anr., Vs the State of Ap., Rep Pp & Anr.

K.VINAY, WEST GODAVARI DT & ANR.,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O D. NO 14-50-2/1 SIRIGINDEEDI SUBBARAYUDU STREET TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶10

K DEEPTHI, W/O K VINAY, OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/O D. NO 14-50-2/1 SIRIGINDEEDI SUBBARAYUDU STREET TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP REP PP ANR, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD.

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER, TADEPALLIGUDEM MUNICIPALITY, TADEPALLIGUDEM.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto file this Criminal Revision Case against the Orders passed by the learned Hon'ble 1st Additonal Judicial Magistrate of First Class Tadepalligudem in Crl.M.P. No 2482/2017 in CC.No. 487/2014, dated 10.08.2017 for the following grounds among other:

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4123 OF 2017

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No 487/2014 on the file Hon'ble 1st Additonal Judicial Magistrate of First Class Tadepalligudem, pending disposal of CrI.R.C., and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶20

1.BS KARTIK & PRASAD ESR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶22

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶23

The Court made the following Order:

¶24

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 10.08.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2482 of 2017 in C.C.No.487 of 2014 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadepalligudem.

¶25

As seen from the case details obtained from the e-Courts website shows that C.C.No.487 of 2014 was disposed of on 10.10.2017. In view of the same, this Court finds that the cause in the Criminal Revision Case does not survive.

¶26