Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt I Suseela Vs G Jaya Lakshmi IAS — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Andhra Pradesh HC
2025
Smt I Suseela Vs G Jaya Lakshmi IASSmt I Suseela v. G Jaya Lakshmi IAS

Disposed¶5

Smt I Suseela v. G Jaya Lakshmi IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Dec 2025CC/1697/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compliance-closure common order in C.C.No.1697/2025 (petitioner SMT I SUSEELA) and C.C.No.1729/2025 (petitioner NAGALLA RAVI) against contemnor-officials including G JAYA LAKSHMI IAS (Principal Secretary, Revenue Department), M HAH/HARI NARAYANAN IAS (Inspector General, Registration and Stamps), G SREE RAM KUMAR (District Registrar), C VIJAYA KUMAR (Sub Registrar, Tirupathi Rural), DR S VENKATESHWAR IAS (District Collector, Tirupati) and B RAMANJULA/ RAMANJUIA NAIK (Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal). Collector & District Magistrate, Tirupati proceeding dated 30.11.2025 filed and taken on record; both counsel confirmed the Court's orders were complied with; contempt cases closed, no costs; interlocutory applications closed. Counsel: Subba Rao Korrapati (petitioners); K M Krishna Reddy (respondents). Decided 04.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

As the orders of this Court stand complied with and no further consideration is necessary, the Contempt Cases are closed with no order as to costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

Issue for consideration

Whether the orders of this Court, compliance with which was sought through these contempt proceedings, have been complied with by the respondents/contemnors such that no further consideration is necessary.

Court's answer

As the orders of this Court stand complied with and no further consideration is necessary, the Contempt Cases are closed with no order as to costs.

Ratio / Principle

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Cases Nos. 1697 and 1729 of 2025 (common order, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, 04.12.2025, Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J): Respondents' counsel produced the Proceeding of the Collector & District Magistrate, Tirupati dated 30.11.2025, which was taken on record. Respondents' counsel submitted that the orders of the Court had been complied with, and petitioners' counsel confirmed compliance stating that no further consideration was necessary. Both contempt cases were accordingly closed with no order as to costs, and interlocutory applications, if any, stood closed in terms of the order.

A

1

[3328]

APHC010338182025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

CONTEMPT CASE Nos: 1697 & 1729 OF 2025

C.C.No.1697 of 2025:

Between:

SMT I SUSEELA, W/O I KESAVA REDDY AGED 48 YEARS, R/O H NO 19-1-23/D2 CHINTHALA CHENU, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

G JAYA LAKSHMI IAS, PRINCIAPI SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDRHA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

M HAH NARAYANAN IAS, INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJYAWADA.

G SREE RAM KUMAR, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SRI TIRUPATI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT, TIRUPATI

C VIJAYA KUMAR, SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI

DR S VENKATESHWAR IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI.

2

B RAMANJULA NAIK, TAHSILDAR, TIRUAPTI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.K M KRISHNA REDDY

C.C.No.1729 of 2025:

Between:

NAGALLA RAVI, S/O N SRI RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D.NO.7-71, PADMAVATHI PURAM, TIRUCHANURU POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

G JAYA LAKSHMI IAS, PRINCIAPI SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDRHA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

DR S VENKATESHWAR IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI.

B RAMANJUIA NAIK, TAHSILDAR, TIRUAPTI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI.

M HARI NARAYANAN IAS, INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJYAWADA.

G SREE RAM KUMAR, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SRI TIRUPATI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT, TIRUPATI

C VIJAYA KUMAR, SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI

...CONTEMNOR(S):

3

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.K M KRISHNA REDDY

The Court made the following:

ORAL COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Sri K.M. Krishna Reddy, learned Counsel for the Respondents.

Sri K.M. Krishna Reddy, learned Counsel for the Respondents, has submitted the Proceeding of the Collector & District Magistrate, Tirupati dated 30.11.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Petitioners and the same is taken on record.

Sri K.M. Krishna Reddy, learned Counsel for the Respondents, submits that the Orders of this Court have been complied with.

Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, has confirmed this position that the Orders of this Court have been complied with and no further consideration is necessary.

Accordingly, these Contempt Cases are closed. No order as to costs.

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

Dt: 04.12.2025

Vns

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the orders of this Court, compliance with which was sought through these contempt proceedings, have been complied with by the respondents/contemnors such that no further consideration is necessary.medium confidence¶3
The court held
As the orders of this Court stand complied with and no further consideration is necessary, the Contempt Cases are closed with no order as to costs.ratio¶5

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
Respondents' counsel submitted the Proceeding of the Collector & District Magistrate, Tirupati dated 30.11.2025.¶2
Prior proceeding
Copy of the Collector's proceeding was supplied to petitioners' counsel and taken on record.¶2
Prior proceeding
Respondents' counsel submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with.¶3
Prior proceeding
Petitioners' counsel confirmed compliance and stated that no further consideration is necessary.¶4

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SMT I SUSEELA¶¶12
SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI
respondent
G JAYA LAKSHMI IAS, PRINCIAPI SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDRHA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT¶¶15
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
M HAH NARAYANAN IAS, INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJYAWADA¶¶16
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
G SREE RAM KUMAR, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SRI TIRUPATI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT, TIRUPATI¶¶17
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
C VIJAYA KUMAR, SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI¶¶18
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
DR S VENKATESHWAR IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI¶¶19
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
B RAMANJULA NAIK, TAHSILDAR, TIRUAPTI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI¶¶21
K M KRISHNA REDDY
petitioner
NAGALLA RAVI¶¶29
SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI
respondent
G JAYA LAKSHMI IAS, PRINCIAPI SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDRHA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT¶¶32
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
DR S VENKATESHWAR IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI¶¶33
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
B RAMANJUIA NAIK, TAHSILDAR, TIRUAPTI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI¶¶34
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
M HARI NARAYANAN IAS, INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJYAWADA¶¶35
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
G SREE RAM KUMAR, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SRI TIRUPATI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT, TIRUPATI¶¶36
K M KRISHNA REDDY
respondent
C VIJAYA KUMAR, SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI¶¶37
K M KRISHNA REDDY

Coram

AI extract

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasadauthor¶¶8

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Andhra Pradesh HC
Decided on: 3 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 8 Jul 2025
Case no.: CC/1697/2025
CNR: APHC010338182025
Bench: Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
Disposal: CLOSED NO COSTS
Case type: CONTEMPT CASE

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Pothurulu Eswara Reddy Vs I Indrani
2 Dec 2025
S.Md. Rafi Vs The State ofAndhra Pradesh
2 Dec 2025
Korra Rambabu Vs B Chalam
2 Dec 2025
M/s. Sri Krishna Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd., Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.
3 Dec 2025
Mangalagiri Venkateswara Rao Vs Sri Satyanarayana Sahu
3 Dec 2025
Nagalla Ravi Vs G Jaya Lakshmi IAS
3 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

Smt I Suseela v. G Jaya Lakshmi IAS, CC/1697/2025 (AP), decided on 3 December 2025.

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history4

Respondents' counsel submitted the Proceeding of the Collector & District Magistrate, Tirupati dated 30.11.2025.
Copy of the Collector's proceeding was supplied to petitioners' counsel and taken on record.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Parties & counsel