Petition seeking mandamus for establishment of a separate Wakf Tribunal in AP after bifurcation. The petitioner's counsel stated the matter was rendered infructuous. The Court closed the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WP(PIL) NO: 122 OF 2021
Between:
K. S. S. Obedullah Hussainy, S/o K.S.S. Abbas Hussaini, Aged 47 years, Occ: Mutavalli and President of Awqaf Property Protection Committee, 12/109-2b Ansar Basha Street, Kadiri and also at R/o. Dargah Hazrath Shah Zaheeruddin Baba Shah Hussainy (R.H.) Kutagulla village, Kadiri Town, Anantapur District, A.P - 515541 Aadhar No.889151248725 Pan No. AOCPH5579P Cell No. 9603055777, email [email protected] Account No. 20392670853 SBI, Yogi Vemana Branch Kadiri
... PETITIONER
AND
... RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in not constituting a-Separate Wakf Tribunal for the State of AP after the bifurcation of the AP State from the United State of Telangana in the year 2014 till date as illegal, arbitrary action on the part of the 1st respondenthereinandalsofornot taking steps in shifting the Wakf Tribunal which is functioning in City Civil Court Complex, Hyderabad from the Telangana State to AP State taking into consideration that public at large are suffering for filing cases before the office at
Telangana State and consequently direct the 1st respondenthereinto initiate immediate steps for establishment of separate wakfTribunalfortheStateofAP.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, directing the 1 St Respondent herein to establish a new Wakf Tribunal for the State of AP in view of the bifurcationoftheAPStatefromthe United State of Telangana in the year 2014 forthwithintheinterestofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOLLURI ARJUN CHOWDARYFOR SRI V.N.V.SURYA DATTU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: THE ADVOCATEGENERAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (TELANGANA)
The Court made the following: ORDER
jr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMABAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.PCPILyNo.l22 of 2021
K.S.S. ObeduUaJi Hussainy,
S/O.K.S.S. Abbas Hussaini, Aged 47 years, Occ: MutavaUi 8e President of Awqaf Property Protection Committee, 12/109-2b Ansar Basha Street, Kadiri and also at R/o. Dargah Hazrath Shah Zaheeruddin Baba Shah Hussainy (R.H) KutaguUa Village, Kadiri Town, Anantapur District, A.P - 515541.
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep., by its Chief Secretary, (GAD) Dept., Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Gimtur District, A.P. State 8e two others.
..Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. V.N.V. Surya Dattu
Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 &? 3 : learned AdvocateGeneral
Dt.:24.01.2024
P.G:
Mr. KoUuri Arjun Chowdary, learned counsel appearingvice Mr. V.N.V. Surya Dattu, learned coimsel for the petitioner,states that the matter is rendered infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the proceedings are closed. No
order as to costs.
2
r
CJ & RRR,r WP(PIL)_122_2021
Pending miscpUaneous applications, if any, shaU stand closed.
.<
To,
SD/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT RE^STKAR
//TRUE COPY// SECTIOWOFf=lcER
Cnr
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED: 24/01/2024
9 *
ORDER
WP(PIL).No.122 of 2021
CLOSING THE WP(PIL) WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the non-constitution of a separate Wakf Tribunal for the State of AP after bifurcation is illegal and arbitrary?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. S. S. Obedullah Hussainy
State of AP
State of Telangana
Principal Secretary Minority Welfare Department
Dhiraj Singh Thakur
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
