R. Narayana Swamy, v. The Director General of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction not to harass the petitioner under Section 160 CrPC. The Court held no adjunction was necessary as an interim order was already passed admitting the matter and directing due process of law by the police.
What did the court decide?
Closed the writ petition and all pending interlocutory applications without costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
//*
Q:
HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO lo
O
WRIT PETITION NO: 9912 OF 2017
Between:
R. Narayana Swamy,S/o Late R. Venkata Ramanappa, Aged about 70 Years R/o H.No. 9-1-43/A/6, Behind Alankar Talkies Prashanth Nagar, Langar House, Hyderabad 500008
...PETITIONER
AND
- The Director General of Police,State of Andhra Pradesh 2nd Floor,
State Fire Control Station, Governerpet, Opp: Police Control Room, Vijayawada - 520002
- The Superintendent of Police,Prakasham District, Ongole 523001
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable in view of an existing interim order passed on 17.04.2017
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Narayana Swamy
- respondent
Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
Superintendent of Police, Prakasham District, Ongole
- respondent
Sub Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, Ongole
- respondent
Smt. P.V. Rishita
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/9912/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court