Dismissed

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, E.G.Dist., and 2 Otrs. v. State of a.P.,Home,Hyd.,and 2 Otrs.

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Apr 2024WP/38887/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the quashing of an FIR as infructuous. The court found no further proceedings to stay on the primary petition and closed related miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, E.G.Dist., and 2 Otrs. Vs… — Quashing and FIR | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 38887 OF 2015

¶6

I) o >
rs

¶7

Between:

¶8

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, S/o. late Subba Rao, aged 52 years, R/o.814-3A, Red Cross Road, Gandhinagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

¶9

M.V.V.Bapayya Chowdary, S/o.Bhaskara Rao Age 51 years. R/o.Flat No.503, Kuchipudi Enclave, Sriramachandra Nagar, Vijayawada,Krishna District.

¶10

S.Prasad S/o.Satyanarayana R/o.D.No.8-39,

¶11

Madhuranagar,Kakinada, East Godavari District.

¶12

...PETITIONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

State of A.P. Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Station House Officer, Bommuru Police Station, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.

¶16

Yelugubanti Haribabu, S/o.late Kondala Rao, R/o.D.No.48-8-6,^GE-2 HP Gas Road, Gunadala, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to FIR No.262/2015 of Bommuru Police Station, Rajahmundry Urban East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, and quash the same in respect to the Petitionefs/Accused Nos. 1 to 3. .V

¶19

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 50095 OF 2015)

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying is filed that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 to 3 in FIR No. 262/ 2015 on the file of Bommuru Police Station, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. B V RAMA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents R1 & R2: GP FOR HOME

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents R3:--

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

APHC010137152015

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

[3310]

¶29

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶30

PRESENT

¶31

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO: 38887/2015

¶33

Between:

¶34

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, E.g.dist., & 2 Otrs. and Others ...PETITIONER(S)

¶35

AND

¶36

State Of A P Home Hyd 2 Otrs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶37

Counsel for the Petitioner{S):

¶38

B V RAMA RAO

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶40

1.GPFOR HOME(AP)

¶41

The Court made the following Order:

¶42

Mr.B.V.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners^{submitsthatthe}

¶43

cause in the present writ petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.

¶44

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the

¶45

official respondents is present.

¶46

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous.

¶47

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶48

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if^{any,shallstand}

¶49

closed.

¶50

Sd/- K L P AVAN I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI. B V RAMA RAO Advocate [OPUC]

¶55

Two CCS to GP FOR HOME (AP) ,High Court Of Andhra^Pradesh.

¶56

[OUT]

¶57

Three CD Copies GSSK PRK

HIGH COURT

D‘ATED:24/04/2024

V 1c" P .i'-

ORDER

WP.No.38887 of 2015

oTSHBs;^
O
(X
0 2 JAN 2125 ^
^ Current Jiectlon
•isi^PATCH^

¶64

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS WITH OUT COSTS

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, E.G.Dist., and 2 Otrs. v. State of a.P.,Home,Hyd.,and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvathini Narsimha Rao, E.G.Dist., and 2 Otrs. v. State of a.P.,Home,Hyd.,and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Katakam Satyanarayana, Vs The Govt. of A.P.

Palla Parvathi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Circar Jute Mills (P) Ltd., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

R. Narayana Swamy, Vs The Director General of Police

P.Liyakhat Ali Khan, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.Kottaraju Annapurna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh