Dismissed

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District v. the Divisional Secretary, Prakasam District and Another

Andhra Pradesh HC11 Aug 2024WP/9616/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash a Labour Court award as infructuous upon the submission by petitioner's counsel that the causa in the petition does not survive for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions in the writ petition closed.

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District Vs the Divisional… — Partition | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

5RT
s

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 9616 OF 2005

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District, Kandukur, Prakasam District.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The Divisional Secretary, Prakasam District, APSRTC Employees Union, Kandukur, Prakasam District.

¶12

The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenature} of writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ to call for the records relating to and in connection the award in I.D. No. 291/97, dated. 07.04.2004 on the file of Labour Court, Guntur which was published on the notice Board of Labour court, Guntur on 20.11.2004 through G.O. Rt. No. 1604, Labour, Employment Training and factories (Lab.l) Department dated. 09.09.2004 and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially to quash the said award and to pass^{suchotherorder} or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶15

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 12575 OF 2005)

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be P to suspend the operation award in l.d.No. 291/97 dt.^07-04-2004on th| l-ilie^df?the|Labour Court, Guntur during the pendency^{ofWritPetitionand} pass sufeh'Qfner order or orders

¶17

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 12140 OF 2005)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copies award made in ID No. 291 of 1997 on the file of the Labour Court Guntur dt. 7-4-2004 for the present

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC)

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR LABOUR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A SRINATH

¶22

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶23

APHC010021512005

¶24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ■J AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶25

MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9616/2005

¶26

Between:

¶27

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District ...PETITIONER AND The Divisional Secretary Prakasam District Another and ...RESPONDENT{S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.Sri.Solomon Raju Manchala for (APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

Learned GP For Labour

¶29

2.Sri.A.Srinath

¶30

The Court made the following order:

¶31

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that^thecause in the writ

¶32

petition does not survive for adjudication.

¶33

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶35

SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTI^N^FICER //TRUE COPY//

¶36

¶37

1 One CC to SRI. SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC) Advocate [OPUC] labour .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR

¶38

Two CCs to GP FOR

¶39

SRI. A SRINATH Advocate [OPUC]

¶40

OneCCto

¶41

Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED: 12/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.9616 of 2005

/3r 18 MAR 2025
's*?.
^ . Current Section ^

¶47

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District v. the Divisional Secretary, Prakasam District and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Depot Manager, Prakasam District v. the Divisional Secretary, Prakasam District and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Venkata Reddy, Kadapa District and 3 Others Vs the V.C. and M.D., Apiic.

Mr.Mathi Venkateshwara Rao, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

The Thandava Sugars Karmika Union Vs Govt. of a.P., Industries and Commerce and 2 Ors.

K. Satyanarayana Murthy and 6 Others Vs the Government of a.P., Cooperation Dept and 10 Others

D.V. Subba Reddy, Vs A.P.S.R.T.C. Cuddapah Region and 2 Others

Y. Sharvan Kumar, Nellore District, Vs the Kovur Co-Op. Sugar Factory Ltd.